










Comment #14757 by brilyn on December 24, 2006 at 11:10 pm
The reason Dawkins doesn't come up with "his own Ultimate Boeing 747 Gambit" is that *his* gambit is as equally valid as the pro-god gambit.
To spell it out: any rebuttal to *his* gambit is *also* a rebuttal to the pro-god gambit.
Thus, it's unanswerable.
Talk about suffering from several problems when trying to reason philosophically.....
Comment #14754 by brilyn on December 24, 2006 at 10:42 pm
recognizability....
For the love of all that's holy: the word is Recognition.... ;)
Otherwise, good rebuttal.