1. The Dawkins Delusion (Different Article, Same Stupid Title)

Comment #15182 by alangdon on December 29, 2006 at 10:43 am

McGRath's book is well worth a read. He makes some decent points. Still, if that's the best defence of theism that Oxford can come up with, Dawkin's need not worry.
Incidentally, does anyone know when Christian theologians became more interested in defending theology than defending Christianity, and when they started writing off the views of the majority of believers as irrelevant? (something McGRath does continuously- I suspect the vast majority of Christians around the globe would willingly identify them more closely with Dawkins view of the Christian God than with McGRath's)?