










601. Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss
Comment #161232 by irate_atheist on April 15, 2008 at 3:50 am
26. Comment #161225 by Artful_Dodger -
So keeping God out of the picture (equation), in that sense, may make a lot of sense. That is why the agenda to KILL religous faith as a "scientific" project does not make sense, because it is science's role to explore the cosmos, not speculate as to the identity or non identity of its hpothetical originator.
602. Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss
Comment #161222 by irate_atheist on April 15, 2008 at 3:39 am
16. Comment #161209 by Artful_Dodger -
Most people instinctively know that science and faith are not incompatible with each other, unless they have been hoodwinked into thinking they are either by religious fundamentalists on the one side or by the likes of Dawkins and his cohorts on the other.Please, enlighten us as to what is not incompatible between science and religion. I would hazard a guess that several professional scientists who post on this site - this thread, even - would be curious to know precisely where they are compatible.
603. For sale: 13-year-old virgin
Comment #161200 by irate_atheist on April 15, 2008 at 2:58 am
23. Comment #160844 by Henri Bergson -
Henri dribbles and pools of saliva puddle on the page.
You commentators here are being very naive: you cannot judge another culture from your own culture's perspective.
'Human rights' is just a western notion that, like 'God', cannot be proven.
In other words, you're all acting like frenzied religious nutcases pushing your unjustified perspective on others.
604. Richard Dawkins' secular army must be stopped. God is behind some of our greatest art
Comment #160492 by irate_atheist on April 14, 2008 at 6:49 am
Yeah, right. And the Aztecs built some good shit in their time so don't knock their sacrificial ways.
WTF?
605. The List: The World's Worst Religious Leaders
Comment #160489 by irate_atheist on April 14, 2008 at 6:48 am
David Robertson
Religion: Christian. (Free Church of Scotland.)
Who is he: A pain in the arse.
Country: Scotland.
Quote: "What is society? Look up Wiki!"
Why he matters: He really gets on my tits.
606. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158906 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 6:51 am
916. Comment #158902 by Quetzalcoatl -
Philip forgot he'd hired a cleaner.
607. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions
Comment #158889 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 6:31 am
350. Comment #158879 by Stew282 -
You don't have to be a theist to be a Rabbi. In some cases they're more of a cultural social worker than a god-botherer.
608. Do stop behaving as if you are God, Professor Dawkins
Comment #158858 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 6:01 am
152. Comment #158847 by Steve Zara -
Pleased I got diverted to this thread for a few minutes. Not least for a thoughtful comment #21198 by one Richard Morgan.
One man is purported to have said, 'Judge not, lest yea be judged'. It is one of the things I agree with the original speaker on - but don't always practice - but agree with in principle. (Without the religious connotations, of course).
609. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158837 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 5:29 am
892. Comment #158831 by Vaal -
I wonder how he would respond to "unbelievers".
610. Fleabytes
Comment #158826 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 5:00 am
7650. Comment #158820 by clodhopper -
It seems silly (to me) to complain that atheism does not meet ones personal needs.Indeed. I prefer pound-cost averaging and compound interest. No false profits, please.
611. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158814 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 4:21 am
Paula -'...the sight of these idiots foaming at the mouth is likely to have a most off-putting effect'. Er...sorry about that.
Oh. Those idiots foaming at the mouth. Yes, quite.
612. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions
Comment #158813 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 4:19 am
337. Comment #158370 by al-rawandi -
A bigot wants us to "trust" him on the theory that one of the greatest and most well documented genocides ever was a fake.Indeed. ArseMarks hardly endears himself to us, does he?
613. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158805 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 3:59 am
877. Comment #158801 by Paula Kirby -
No matter how they try to sell it, a gilded turd smells just as bad as a fresh unadulterated one. This is their major problem.
614. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158778 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 3:16 am
860. Comment #158776 by BillySands -
I blame their god myself. Look at how his son went about spitting on blind folk.Ooh. I didn't know that one. Please enlighten me further Billy.
615. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158774 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 3:09 am
Dear all -
More 'Christian Fellowship':
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/apr/11/anglicanism.religion
May I be the first to say, spitter!
616. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158762 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:49 am
Before anyone starts pestering me on this thread.
Oblig: Fucktard.
850. Comment #158760 by Tyler Durden -
Thanks. Lying for Jesus, indeed...
617. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158756 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:33 am
846. Comment #158752 by Goldy -
What would Jesus say?Either:
618. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158748 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:13 am
842. Comment #158745 by epeeist -
Well, I did once put a picture of Robert Mugabe in a strategic place and, yes, it was nicely watered by the next morning.
Edit: 820. Comment #158691 by Vulcan
Total shite from start to finish, and you know it is.
Or you can look for me between 1000 and 1300 UTC most days of the week on the following Ventrilo ServerNo thanks. I'd rather stare at a cruet set for a couple of hours instead.
619. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158747 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:11 am
841. Comment #158744 by alan baylis -
Don't worry. I'd never assume you were describing me as an honest person...
620. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158742 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 2:04 am
833. Comment #158729 by Steve Zara -
The cat's contributions are infinitely more intelligible.
834. Comment #158731 by epeeist -
*Splutters*.
How could you even suggest such a thing?
621. Lungless frog discovered in Borneo
Comment #158730 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:42 am
12. Comment #158705 by Adam Morrison -
'My frog has no nose'
'How does it smell?'
'Dreadful!'
*-> coat.....
622. Expelled Overview
Comment #158727 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:41 am
So, he's out on day release again.
This whole care in the community concept has some serious flaws in its execution.
623. Did pre-big bang universe leave its mark on the sky?
Comment #158726 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:39 am
Steve -
I agree. About as speculative as a punt on the Grand National, and with less chance of knowing who the winner is.
624. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #158724 by irate_atheist on April 11, 2008 at 1:37 am
827. Comment #158718 by epeeist -
My cat leaves something more intelligent in it's litter tray most mornings.
625. Rep. Davis: The Worst Person in the World
Comment #158268 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 9:14 am
74. Comment #158264 by Vaal -
And people accuse of us of being joyless :-)Joyless, probably not. Witless, well...that's another question. It is left as an exercise for the reader to determine.
626. Rep. Davis: The Worst Person in the World
Comment #158257 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 9:01 am
62. Comment #158232 by epeeist -
Absolutely agree. It's that people are prone to equate engineer with mechanic. And mechanics use engineering priciples to fix things, so - in effect - they're another branch of applied science. I'll rely on my garage's mechanicsfor advice on the car, because, well, they damn well know what they're talking about. I've known car designers I wouldn't let anywhere near a sump for fear of what they'd do...
We digress. The real purpose of this post was to - at Vaal's implicit request - pronounce judgement upon the festering dung-pile known as kjmastaw.
Verdict: Guilty of perverting the course of Natural Selection.
Bailiff - send in the next defendant.
Aah, Mr Robertson, so nice to see you...
Edit:Oh, as everyone here seems so insistent:
kjmastaw. It's official. You're a fucktard.
627. Rep. Davis: The Worst Person in the World
Comment #158225 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 8:28 am
59. Comment #158217 by epeeist -
Hmm...does my Masters in Engineering Sciences count as:
Engineering?
or
Science?
Before I pronounce judgement on the unfortunate kjmsastaw I need to know from what position I should launch my attack...
56. Comment #158191 by Vaal -
By all means. I await Epeeist's judgement on my position, first.
628. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion
Comment #158207 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 8:06 am
51. Comment #158192 by hungarianelephant -
Unless, as irate says, the rent boys were telling him how to vote.See? I don't just spout a load of old bollocks...
629. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion
Comment #158155 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 6:41 am
43. Comment #158124 by hungarianelephant -
Yes, if he thought the rent boys were telling him how to vote in primary legislation...
630. Fleabytes
Comment #158142 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 6:05 am
I'm BAEOZ!!!
Edit: Steve - I like the t-shirt!!
631. Fleabytes
Comment #158125 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 5:17 am
On the subject of starting a topic in a topic, more halfwittery from the self-deluded:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20080410/tuk-cathedral-puts-ban-on-jerusalem-6323e80.html
The Pratt Green Trust(!).
Man - you couldn't make it up. At least, not as well as they do.
632. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion
Comment #158115 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 4:53 am
40. Comment #158111 by epeeist -
I'll be the turd in the punchbowl here.
I think we should be at least aware of whether someone applying for one of the most powerful jobs in the world is, in fact, a total fruitcake.
634. Fleabytes
Comment #158081 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 3:59 am
7585. Comment #158077 by Quetzalcoatl -
Better than that, it was, if read slyly, rather vague.
After all, Keith said he'd be back within the month. But he was crafty enough not to specify which particular month...
635. Fleabytes
Comment #158074 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 3:45 am
7579. Comment #158067 by epeeist -
Keith Akbar!
Edit: Brian, Steve - I feel I have seen an overreaction on all sides the last couple of days, which is a real shame. In real life I like to give people the benefit of the doubt (no, really I do) - after all, we are only human. This forum allows me a vent - something the majority of us need from time to time. Some of my posts could be taken the wrong way, but usually people know when I'm being deliberately offensive to them, and I hope the rest get the joke...
636. Reviews of Expelled
Comment #158042 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:50 am
9. Comment #158036 by Richard Dawkins -
One argument against Intelligent Design could be the lack of the former aspect amongst it's proponents...
637. Commentary: Democrats finally getting religion on religion
Comment #158037 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:45 am
Pandering to the pillocks.
638. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions
Comment #158035 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:34 am
Quetz -
Given that we know DR is full of shit, this 'pack of lies' response is not particularly surprising.
Edit: Feel free to quote mine that, you self-serving prick, DR.
639. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions
Comment #158032 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:30 am
261. Comment #158026 by irate_atheist -
I don't say fucktard much in the same way that you hardly ever proclaim yourself to be a god.Well, I have to have faith in myself, and if I declared myself to be a god, I'd stop believing in myself and this could lead to all sorts of unforeseen consequences.
640. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions
Comment #158026 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:21 am
Philip, Quetz, Steve et al -
Why is it that I'm the one that's forced to be the first to call this ignorant prick a fucktard?
It simply isn't fair.
Your future cooperation in this matter would be much appreciated.
641. Expelled producers accused of copyright infringement
Comment #158025 by irate_atheist on April 10, 2008 at 2:11 am
My heart bleeds for them. It's such a shame.
642. Richard Dawkins on The Big Questions
Comment #157562 by irate_atheist on April 9, 2008 at 9:08 am
127. Comment #157517 by ASMarques -
Wiful ignorance takes many forms.
Yours is just another example of human stupidity writ large.
643. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'
Comment #157408 by irate_atheist on April 9, 2008 at 4:12 am
Epeeist -
PM for you.
644. Get out of here, atheists!
Comment #157406 by irate_atheist on April 9, 2008 at 4:03 am
210. Comment #157400 by Shenonymous -
I'm not entirely sure. I think that for some their god (or) gods give them a moral 'benchmark' to follow. However, some of the moral ones decide what the benchmark is on the grounds that you can pretty much make a case for any kind of behaviour as a theist - so they choose the 'best bits' and interpret the rest as, well, it was different in those days...
Rationalisers - not rationalists.
Just my tuppence worth.
645. Anti-evolution bill clears another hurdle
Comment #157379 by irate_atheist on April 9, 2008 at 2:45 am
Another good reason not to invest in the USA...
646. Fleabytes
Comment #156810 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:32 am
7524. Comment #156804 by Quetzalcoatl -
Rather sad, really. I feel sorry for the guy.
647. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'
Comment #156796 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:11 am
204. Comment #156793 by Bonzai -
It is a public statement of committment to someoene else.
Mind you, I'd always expected to have a quiet wedding in a registry office, whereas....
648. Richard Dawkins: 'Growth in creationist beliefs a problem for schools'
Comment #156791 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:05 am
199. Comment #156783 by Steve Zara -
Good man!
649. In search of the God particle
Comment #156789 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 9:03 am
12. Comment #156785 by Quetzalcoatl -
He was referring to Jesus Harrington. The well known wrecker of various scientific experiments. He really screwed up one by Schrodinger when he brought a tin of 'Whiskas' into the lab. Boy, were they mad about that.
650. Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov tries suicide after realising he was wrong about doomsday
Comment #156780 by irate_atheist on April 8, 2008 at 8:51 am
315. Comment #156773 by dunf2562 -
I can just picture 99% of you lot trampling over your own grannies to get his/her own equally whacky, unjustifiable ideas and teachings into general circulationPlease specify which particular unjustifiable ideas and teachings you are referring to.