51. Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Paula Kirby

Comment #157769 by Animavore on April 9, 2008 at 2:07 pm

What's in the name Diacanu anyway?

52. Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Paula Kirby

Comment #157764 by Animavore on April 9, 2008 at 2:03 pm

Diacanu
Lie back and close your eyes.

When listening to the sounds.

53. Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Paula Kirby

Comment #157709 by Animavore on April 9, 2008 at 12:51 pm

Just pause it while you wait for it to load then press play.

54. Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Paula Kirby

Comment #157625 by Animavore on April 9, 2008 at 10:52 am

Good answer. I was just trying to throw a spanner in the ointment for the larf. Just in case anyone thought I was Christian being smart (in the way a smart alec kid is smart).

55. Discussion between Richard Dawkins and Paula Kirby

Comment #157409 by Animavore on April 9, 2008 at 4:12 am

Dawkins states at the beginning of this interview that he is very thankful to be living in such an era as this one but, I ask you, thankful to whom?

56. Upside-down church sculpture on hit list

Comment #155349 by Animavore on April 4, 2008 at 11:24 am

"It's more amusing if you know that a steeple is a phallic symbol."

What's it doing to mother earth?

57. Dawkins warns of human extinction

Comment #155271 by Animavore on April 4, 2008 at 9:42 am

Why do people worry so much about human extinction? They'll all be extinct by the time it happens anyway.

58. Upside-down church sculpture on hit list

Comment #155240 by Animavore on April 4, 2008 at 9:07 am

Or the Harlot in her Starlet.
The Yoke wi' a Smoke
The Whore in the Sewer
(pronounce whore like who-er, the Dublin way)
The Slapper with her Papa.

59. Upside-down church sculpture on hit list

Comment #155181 by Animavore on April 4, 2008 at 8:13 am

I'm from Dublin, I never heard anyone say much about the 'Tart with the Cart' or the 'Hags with the Bags.'
Always hated the floosy in the jacoussi though.
Phil Lynetts pretty cool.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Philip_Lynott_Dublin_Statue.jpg/450px-Philip_Lynott_Dublin_Statue.jpg

60. Iowa county board gives initial OK for ghost hunters to investigate asylum

Comment #151359 by Animavore on March 28, 2008 at 2:46 pm

Who ye gonna bleedin call (said sarcastically)

This really is tiring. I'm going to retire for the night. Night night.

61. 'We Make Our Own Heaven'

Comment #151358 by Animavore on March 28, 2008 at 2:43 pm

Is theaching a child to be an atheist child abuse?

The question is firmly tongue in cheek.
I personally agree with Daniel Dennets proposition about teaching children *the facts* about all the worlds religions ie history, teachings etc... although i do admit it'll be hard to not let my own views enter the subject.

I still don't know what to do about the 'Santa' question.

62. Happy Birthday, Richard Dawkins!

Comment #149935 by Animavore on March 26, 2008 at 10:42 am

Nappy Mirthday! I'll drink a few Guinness for ye down the pub tonight.

63. Expelled Overview

Comment #149443 by Animavore on March 25, 2008 at 3:53 pm

Too knackered from work (check the dark rings under my eyes) to illicit an emotional response so I'll resort to Homer/helper-monkey disinterest.

Meh.

64. It looks like Man crucified

Comment #148432 by Animavore on March 23, 2008 at 4:27 am

I gave up on it too. I mean fair play to him to be able to live his life like that but to claim it's his faith in Jesus made him like that? C'mon man, you did it, you're the innovator. Why give the credit to a 2000 year old hippy?

65. The death-of-god debate

Comment #148422 by Animavore on March 23, 2008 at 4:08 am

It is annoying the way people call 'atheism' a faith. I fully agree with Sam Harris who thinks that we shouldn't even call ourselves atheists (I certainly don't go around talking like some parody of a Little Britain character, 'I'm the only ahteist in the village.) Other labels that annoy me too are 'Darwinist,' which in my mind is no different to being called 'Davidian,' and Neo-Darwinist, which draws parallels with Neo-Nazis. (probably the intention because it's the religious who seem to use it.) Another thing that annoys me is the 'Out Campaign,' which frankly I think, with it's advertisements showing young people wearing those horrible 'A' t-shirts, reminds me of some kind of secular version of 'BattleCry.' I've read John Grays works and I do admit enjoying them and agreeing on some points and even though I don't agree that atheism is like religion at all at all, I do think that we are guilty of doing things that make it seem that way.

66. It looks like Man crucified

Comment #148419 by Animavore on March 23, 2008 at 3:54 am

Em...
Wha'...
Em..
Sorry, I don't get ye?

67. No Admission for Evolutionary Biologist at Creationist Film

Comment #148124 by Animavore on March 22, 2008 at 6:35 am

Scratch what I said earlier about this film going to be big in America..

In light of recent evidence
http://mattcbr.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/expelled-no-intelligence-allowed-why-its-a-load-of-bunk/

68. I suppose it's due ('Expelled' review)

Comment #148073 by Animavore on March 22, 2008 at 12:59 am

Why were no religious evolutionists interviewed? So much for the unbiased account it is being advertised as and even purported to be on the IMDB reviews. Put together religious evolutionists make up more than the atheists, many believe evolution is gods creation so they already are intellignet designers but they have the cop-on to know that their beliefs can't be measured and so keep it out of science.

69. No Admission for Evolutionary Biologist at Creationist Film

Comment #148069 by Animavore on March 22, 2008 at 12:51 am

This article gives a very different view of the situation.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2008/03/richard_dawkins_worlds_most_fa.html
Shit is heating up, this film WILL be big whether you like it or not. I predict protests, court-cases and even riots. Be realistic, the Bible-belt loves starting shit and evolutionists (most of which are religious, why weren't they in the film?) will have to retaliate.
I'm just glad it will be ignored mainly here in Ireland and I presume the rest of Europe too (hopefully).

70. No Admission for Evolutionary Biologist at Creationist Film

Comment #148067 by Animavore on March 22, 2008 at 12:37 am

The first 2 reviews of this movie are on IMDB. I'm not gonna add one without seeing it but at the moment the reviews are favourable. Hopefully the rebuttal will be swift to follow.

71. EXPELLED!

Comment #147666 by Animavore on March 21, 2008 at 5:11 am

Why do people keep equating evolution with atheism anyway? There's more religious evolutionists than atheists when put together, many believe evolution is gods way of creating (so it's a form of creationism in that sense) even the lead scientist on the Killmister trial was a devout Christian. I hope religious scientists make a stand against this and other lay religious yet sensible people.

72. EXPELLED!

Comment #147664 by Animavore on March 21, 2008 at 5:05 am

INteresting. Still no review or star rating on IMDB. It's hardly blocked is it. I thought they'd be rushing out to add their 2 cents. For and against. Blogs are there though.

73. EXPELLED!

Comment #147613 by Animavore on March 21, 2008 at 1:29 am

Yeah I agree with PJG. I didn't know that much about the movie when I first read this post but after quickly educating myself on it in a mere 20 minutes, reading reviews by Christians and learning the movies content, I can predict a shit-storm in America (who knows, maybe here in Ireland too) over this film. This is not good.

74. EXPELLED!

Comment #147610 by Animavore on March 21, 2008 at 1:14 am

So I guess we'll be seeing reviews on IMDB soon?

75. EXPELLED!

Comment #147608 by Animavore on March 21, 2008 at 1:11 am

There's a new post relating to this in Pharngula.

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

76. EXPELLED!

Comment #147596 by Animavore on March 21, 2008 at 12:09 am

I wonder if this film will get a European release? I will, of course, be downloading it for free as I refuse to give money to this 'cause.' Hope Richie boy has a review later today. (what will Johnaton Ross say?)

77. Flipping particle could explain missing antimatter

Comment #146578 by Animavore on March 19, 2008 at 7:51 am

This information has shaken my faith in physics. Crisis of conscience.

Oh.. it's ok. It's passed.

78. Jesus saves

Comment #146575 by Animavore on March 19, 2008 at 7:49 am

To answer Lucas, yes, I eat souls.

79. Jesus saves

Comment #146526 by Animavore on March 19, 2008 at 7:00 am

Maybe they should do a study on why atheists DONT believe. I know it seems obvious to you or me but I'm just calling for a balance.

80. In Britain, creationist theory is evolving

Comment #144657 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 2:19 pm

Why to they keep equating atheism with hedonism? Hedonism is a choice amongst atheists and I myself lived that life in my early 20's but, I just grew out of it. Gradually. No trumpets, no parade, now I immerse myself in books on various topics to keep my mind active and exercised. I never felt I had to cling to the life preserver of Christianity or any other religion to mend ways which I never thought needed mending because I didn't have the AA style guilt culture to make me feel debased, to lower me down to a miserable wretch so that it could build me back up again to be a man. (whatever that even means...how many roads must a man walk and all that) More indication that religion is for those with weak constitutions.

81. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144612 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 12:17 pm

Hitler believed what he was doing too.

82. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144606 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Oops. I meant faith. (or did I)

83. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144604 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 12:07 pm

Yeah right. Re-think his life? Have you never seen a charlatan debunked before? I'll be keeping an eye out for a follow up, check out his excuse. You can bet your pimply little ass much of his followers will just band tighter around him. Funny as this is to us, believers are rock solid in their fate.

84. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144592 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 11:32 am

I just can't believe the Shamen guy kept up the charade. Was he hoping that Sanal might die from old age in the mean time?

85. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144564 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 10:42 am

Hey that rationalist international site is full of interesting articles.

86. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144554 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 10:28 am

Na. Just to wipe the smug off his face.

87. 'Anonymous' takes anti-Scientology to the streets

Comment #144549 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 10:23 am

"What do you expect from a "religion" made up by a Sci-Fi writer?"

Light-sabers?

88. In Britain, creationist theory is evolving

Comment #144546 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 10:21 am

Yawn!

Wake me when the world wakes up to reason.

"snore"

89. The Great Tantra Challenge

Comment #144544 by Animavore on March 16, 2008 at 10:18 am

Dammit. I was really hoping he'd die.

90. The business of natural selection

Comment #144147 by Animavore on March 15, 2008 at 7:52 am

Could we manipulate this data against multi-national corporations?

91. Selling science to the masses

Comment #144144 by Animavore on March 15, 2008 at 7:50 am

Also we need more good looking cool scientists like Brian Cox, Lisa Randell, That Polish woman, Olga something and Tyson (how cool is that) out there presenting shows and documentrys with cool computer effects and less cardigan wearing Raelian lookin' mo'fo's with trousers around their armpits.

...and the geek shall inheirit the earth...

Get over yerself, jesus-esqe/dr. phil style nice words bear no relation in real life. Sorry L-heads, that's just the way it is.

92. I don't believe in atheists

Comment #143734 by Animavore on March 14, 2008 at 10:29 am

I think someone was reading John Gray. Still I do understand his point of view, it's pretty much like Trey Parker and Matt Stones, he wants to see a world without -isms, and I would agree, even though I'm an atheist I don't usually go around stating this fact and usually, when trying to make someone question their belief, I don't bring up the word at all because it would immediantly 'undermine' my position (causing the believers immediate hate in me in otherwords). But the point he misses is that atheists don't have a fixed view. As far as I know Hitchens and Dawkins held opposite opinons on the Iraq issue. How can atheism be dangerous when it is desultory and amorphous, and to re-iterate previous posts, it's a lack of belief NOT a belief.

93. Deadly Sins 101

Comment #143056 by Animavore on March 13, 2008 at 11:53 am

Those this mean we have to write a new 'Inferno' or 'Cantenbury Tales?'

And 'SE7EN' will have to be changed into 'FOURTEEN' and have twice has many victims.

94. The ethics of mixing science and religion

Comment #142509 by Animavore on March 12, 2008 at 3:18 pm

I MEAN FOR FU... eck sake. Did he really ask that question? I'd have sex with another man for that amount. I'd lose a little finger.. I'd eat dung. You only have to live with the embarrassment for a bit then you're laughing for the rest of your easy life getting fat.

95. The ethics of mixing science and religion

Comment #142503 by Animavore on March 12, 2008 at 3:10 pm

I see priests lurking in playgrounds.

96. The ethics of mixing science and religion

Comment #142496 by Animavore on March 12, 2008 at 3:01 pm

Seriously! They're asking atheists do they have a problem taking money of a religious group? Don't they know we're not sukers duped into living a life of 'modesty' I mean, sure we have our morals (don't we) but we're not feckin' stupid. I'd take money of a gangster if I thought it would get me my dream life of living as a nomad out of hotels always on the move, never answering to no one. It's like asking a bee if it would take nectar off a flower.

97. The ethics of mixing science and religion

Comment #142473 by Animavore on March 12, 2008 at 2:37 pm

Simple answer. Yes.

98. Two More Fleas

Comment #142450 by Animavore on March 12, 2008 at 2:01 pm

Do I care?

Do I fuck.

99. Chemical brain controls nanobots

Comment #142255 by Animavore on March 12, 2008 at 7:42 am

"First "blue brain," now "nano-brains!"

In the future, if these computer-based intelligences ever attain a life-like sense of existence--will they worship humans as "intelligent designer" deities?"

They might for a while but eventually, like god, we will over-step our usefulness.

100. Seven new deadly sins: are you guilty?

Comment #141683 by Animavore on March 11, 2008 at 4:56 am

And the church just keeps adding bits on...