RichardDawkins.net

Comment #240762 by isthatclear on September 1, 2008 at 2:36 am

If you watch the video you can't miss it. He mentions about nobel prize winners.

Comment #239639 by isthatclear on August 30, 2008 at 5:37 am

Apology accepted. Thanks Philip.

Let's see what other delusional atheists delude about?

(Yours is already worn out and sick.)
Not too much to think that I came from a lovely tiny worm.

Slippy

Don't get slippery and use self descriptive adjectives. I have got a different view of Christianity. So I agree with anyone who does not agree on that "Jesus died for our sins" verse in Bible. Everybody will account for own deeds. Like a divine bank account.

Quetzalcoat

Nothing to reply but….
Don't you have your web site lady, the pearl. You really make sense when you chit chat with her. I donna wann hurt your feelings by not answering you. This is the last time okay. Please gp play with her.

Nmcc

Nice name. It is also out of evolution tree?

So Mr dawkins, do you still dare to challenge the students and try to trach them ET/

53. Richard Dawkins on Talkback Radio

Comment #238964 by isthatclear on August 28, 2008 at 8:10 pm

To Philip

When you say that I am distorting the truth, you are distorting the truth. The list I sent it to you is accurate. Do not deceive yourself and no to try to cheat me and others.

List of Christian scientists

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_Scientists_(religious_denomination)

List of Jewish scientists

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Jewish_scientists

List of Muslim scientists

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_scientists

From the list.
Charles Darwin was an Anglican, but by most accounts he appears to have been largely nominal in his affiliation with the Church of England. Darwin may be better classified as a Unitarian. He was a member of a Unitarian congregation which he attended regularly during at least part of his life.

During Darwin's lifetime, the Unitarian Church was considered a relatively mainstream Protestant Christian denomination, although many of its beliefs even then separated it from other Protestant denominations. Today Unitarianism (known since a merger as Unitarian-Universalism in many parts of the world) is considered a distinct religion and not a subset of Christianity, but during the time that Darwin lived, there was no concept of Unitarianism as a "non-Christian religion."

Darwin has been classified variously as deist and an agnostic. Of course, these are not religious affiliations in his case, but are classifications of his theological beliefs. Darwin was never a member of any Deist or Agnostic organizations.
From: "Religious Affiliations of Celebrities" page in "Celebrity Religion" section of "Religion Facts" website (http://www.religionfacts.com/celebrities/religions_of_celebrities.htm; viewed 20 April 2007):
Below is an index of the religious affiliations or belief systems of celebrities (both living and dead; in film, television, music, literature, academics and politics), listed in alphabetical order by last name...
Celebrity: Charles Darwin
Religion/Belief: Anglicanism/ Unitarianism
Quotes, More Information, Sources:
The evolutionary biologist was nominally an Anglican, but attended a Unitarian church. - Adherents.com [link to: http://www.adherents.com/people/pd/Charles_Darwin.html]

If you wanna still not to put himm on the list, that is okay. He is your guy.

54. Richard Dawkins on Talkback Radio

Comment #238340 by isthatclear on August 28, 2008 at 2:50 am

Reason: Nurse! The patient has escaped again. Bring his medication!

Nurse: Oh man not again?

Reason: What is wrong with that guy?

Nurse:He thinks that he came from the worm so he always runs out to the yard to collect some worms.

Reason: Really? But this is so bad. How did this happen to him?

Nurse: He was indoctrinated in his childhood by his biology teacher and he was lost later on.

Tyler:

You are getting funnier and now you are assuming that the world will last that longer, thus, there will be no sun; Then the result is that sun is not designed well? Good logic and assumption(again? How do you know that the earth will live that long? Assumption again?

Go take a rest, clear your mind and be cool and come back.

Styrer:
(You will go through the dying process. Maybe you will have pain, maybe you will not.
But you will die. You will be dead forever.)

I agree with that. My body will die but not my soul. Soul is everything to us. He feels pains, happiness sadness etc. Our souls will be risen to heaven and kept there and we will have still mind and conscious as we have now.

(Who ever talked abvout evolution having anything to do with the Sun's location relative to the Earth?)

Please enlighten us who designed the Solar system addressing to our logic if you can.

Vaal;
Please don' be a fly. You will mess up with evolution tree.

To Philip

(I would love to know precisely which facts Richard was busy distorting, come on, I want examples!)

I am coming. One of his distorted truths.

Mr Dawkins

In your lecture, you clamed that only eight believers had noble prizes. But anyone who can google can find the SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, an objective one. So why are you lying? Will it help to prove that we came from the worm? The same distortion is for the population of the atheists in the states. Prove me if I am wrong.

The believers who received Noble prizes.

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_Nobel.html

55. Why Dawkins is right and his critics are wrong

Comment #238334 by isthatclear on August 28, 2008 at 2:28 am

J mac

(In this last post it is not confusing. In all your previous posts, yes quite confusing. Your posts have been garbled gibberish at best.)

Respect is earned not asked for it. Mr Dawkins insulted all believers very often by mocking them, so,if he does not respect others, he will not receive any respect from others either. That is very simple.

(you accuse professor Dawkins of lying,)

Accusation is something you blame on someone without any proof. But mine is not accusation, Honour!

In your lecture, you clamed that only eight believers had noble prizes. But anyone who can google can find the SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, an objective one. So why are you lying? Will it help to prove that we came from the worm? The same distortion is for the population of the atheists in the states. Prove me if I am wrong.

The believers who received Noble prizes.

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_Nobel.html

Still you don't get it join the club of being evasive or three monkeys.

To Mitchell Glitts

(Why do you beat your wife and molest your children?)

You do the same to your family so that you think or advice same thing to others? Two blind men story? Remember? One eats two meatballs and he thinks that other one east two meatballs at one go. Nice avatar and matches with your comments. Good riddance.

56. Richard Dawkins on Talkback Radio

Comment #237718 by isthatclear on August 27, 2008 at 4:31 am

Serious matters

(Giving up the hope for life after death)
The hope after death is even a consolation or some atheists. Because, whatever the atheists says, like, I will die and then that is it, deep inside, the thought of be gone forever is really bothering them. No matter how much they try to seem cool, indeed, dying and blending in soil eaten by worms etc are really creepy and scary for them.

We will all go back where we come from. And we have no fear. When we die, we will leave our body that is worn out by sicknesses or being old. And we will have a new body in a different structure.

(If there is any kind of afterlife, it would almost certainly be totally unlike what the major religions would have you believe it is.)
Sure it will be as the holy religions state.

(The problem I have with people who believe in religions is that they spend much of life preparing for something which is very, very likely not true. Instead of preparing for "the next world". you should be living your *life* and doing what you can to help future *living* generations after you are gone (whether it be your children, or grandchildren, or humanity in general, or whatever).

Nope. I teach my students and I raise them for future as a good citizen to their country, a good family members their family and their parents and good one to themselves by NOT LYING, NOT CHEATING AND NOT DISTORTING THE TRUTH.

I do this just because I want to be useful and no expectations from God for myself.

(That caller obviously knows nothing about astronomy if he's using the Sun/Moon as his premise. Why would this grand designer give the Sun a limited supply of fuel,)

I did not know that sun needs oil and it will be finished soon. Any discovery lately? Or Another delusion since Sun has been burning for million years as it is designed without any problem as the best heater located at its best location (evolution did it. Please not again.)

Funny topics

Richard is again superb AT WHAT? DISTORTING THE FACTS.

Is Richard really suggesting we are just apes.

Monkey business

Delusional world of Mr Dawkins.
Tell me about it. I got a ape housemaid and he shops, cooks, serves, cleans the house, thinks, figures out and worship to its ancestor worm at nights.

But one thing: how an ape would do that in real world without having consciousness and perception and conception as we human beings have?

Mr Dawkins

How do you think you and my gifted class have a discussion live on TV?

57. Why Dawkins is right and his critics are wrong

Comment #237258 by isthatclear on August 26, 2008 at 9:09 am

dear evolins

I asked very simple question to Mr dawkins? Why did he lie or why did he need to lie? Is this really confusing what I am asking? Or I have to say it in Italian language? I quoted the truth about Nobel winners. So why is he lying? My students and I need just an answer. Insulting or acting dummy or playing three monkeys is not scientific, isn't it? Is it too much to ask Mr dawkins why he lied?

58. Why Dawkins is right and his critics are wrong

Comment #236976 by isthatclear on August 25, 2008 at 3:35 pm

(EVOLUTION is stupid and that's all there is to it. There is no equivalence with science, and we must resist the claim that there is. aTHEISM belongs with the other fairy tales and horror stories.)

i guess gentleman made a typo. reason and science corrected it. Here are the characters of that horrrible story:

Genies
blind blindwatcmaker
methinking
evolution tree
fabricated fossils
menotthinking

don't ya think?

That ;s why the students are scared in this genius of Darwin program.

Mr dawkins, if you want to swear, just do it to relax as your followers do it since you cannot give any logical answer and explain your lies. Don't keep it inside

59. Why Dawkins is right and his critics are wrong

Comment #236794 by isthatclear on August 25, 2008 at 10:27 am

Figures reflect the truth. Winning comes along with. And you lovely Dawkins started it. Isn't it? But he lied and now we wait for his reply; how did he lie as an educator and scientific person(!)?

60. Why Dawkins is right and his critics are wrong

Comment #236792 by isthatclear on August 25, 2008 at 10:24 am

Yes Mr dawkins

We are still waiting your explanation or answer; Why did you lie?

Do not trust on your fellow supporters' screamings and swearings. They are lying more when they are trying to save you along with a very profound display of atheistic personalities.

Well?

61. Why Dawkins is right and his critics are wrong

Comment #236659 by isthatclear on August 25, 2008 at 3:02 am

Why the critics of Dawkins' critics are wrong?

To Mr Dawkins says

(That is a bloody lie.)

I totally agree in the following.

In your lecture, you clamed that only eight believers but anyone who can google can find the SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, an objective one. So why are you lying? Will it help to prove that we came from the worm? The same distortion is for the population of the atheists in the states. Prove me if I am wrong.

The believers who received Noble prizes.

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_Nobel.html

Atheists and agnostics comprise 12% of adults nationwide (in the states). (2004)

Quoted from:
http://atheism.about.com/b/2004/12/02/how-many-atheists-in-america.htm
In respect to the atheist population of the world, there have been many studies in regards to the atheist demographics and in regards to the percentage of atheists in various geographic areas. In regards to the atheist population as a percentage of various countries' populations, specific research on atheists conducted in 2006 suggests that the true proportion of atheists is 4% in the United States, 17% in Great Britain and 32% in France. A survey published in the 2005 Encyclopedia Britannica stated that 2.3% of the world's population consists of individuals who profess "atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious."[1] In regards to the 2.3% figure just mentioned, the 2005 survey cited by Encyclopedia Britannica survey did not include Buddhist in regards to the 2.3% figure and Buddhism can be theistic or atheistic.[2][3]

Quoted from:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheist_Population

Please answer my questions if you can. If you don't, my students and I will conclude that you are a bloody liar that tell bloody lies. You are still being evasive or dodging.

(Please apologize NOW. As an educator, I feel extremely strongly about this.)

Same here. You TRIED TO MOCK 6 BILLION BELIEVERS in your lecture. So do you feel like to apologize us at least for distorting the truth.

Second, do not try to indoctrinate the school children into evolution idea. Their minds are fresh, clean and very straightforward. They would not care how hurting it is when they tell the truth. Next time you will be mocked more than disappointed.

It seems that you quit on grown-ups but your efforts inspired and tempted from my comments involved mocking evolution in my class will not be working for evolution to prove otherwise. And you tried and you failed thus you saw it yourself.

62. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #236590 by isthatclear on August 24, 2008 at 8:57 pm

To Dhamma;
(You cannot disprove the evolution with out evidence for its fallacies. You have no evidence to disprove it. The proof for the evolution, however, is massive.)

Oh man! What a mess we have here. After the evolution tree jungle, we have a jungle of replies, all of which are self descriptive of the personalities. But the one above is really so tempting.
(You cannot disprove the evolution)

Do i have to disprove that we did not come from a worm? That is funny. Really funny. My students will love it.

By the anybody still dare not to wtite the evolution tree? We are all mutating to see it. Even non scientist keeps checking whether the worm turns into an elephant?

Please give us the INFO who turned into what?

63. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #234210 by isthatclear on August 21, 2008 at 2:04 am

To dear rain
Please DO rain dearly.

(I for one support your practice of moving irrelevant or unintelligible comments)

Mr Dawkins mentions the followings:

Child farms
He does not understand with his limited knowledge and perception and conception that how God hears the prayers so he concludes god does not exists

He claims that evolution and its lovely evolution tree is not complex and even that we came from a worm through lot s of mutations evolutions lovely genies and assumptions is not complex but God's creation is complex. I even would not call ET is complex as I explained before.

He decided to be American.
e distorts the innocent children's pictures in his lecture to have credit for ET and make people laugh.

He says, the parents who have home schooling must be punishment.

Noble prize believers are only 8 ((which I proved that he is wrong again)

Are all intellectual?

Please you can deceive yourself, or some others but not me and 6 billion believers ( He gave this number in his lecture)

(mentally unstable creationist crusaders.)

(Crusading the truth is good but distorting the truth to feed your ego is not good. )

Yes Mr dawkins, why did you say only eight believers got noble prize? We are waiting for an answer.

(Please go score your afterlife points.)

Excuse me, Mr. rain, there is battle between Reason and ET along with a lot of insult to believers, so if you can play along, you do. Bring up an argument to my analogies and logic, or do not embrace the ace card of "I do not understand, poor English, unintelligible.

Score for afterlife points, that is interesting.
I never heard. I am here just because i want to defend the truth. I am not expecting any points.
I am not being funny as well to get applaused or using people's pictures to be funny so that i can get applause.

Truth does not need to be applasued.

That's so funny when you mention unintelligible, and defending evolution tree which is totally unintelligible. Oh man! This is ironic, indeed.

I am sooooo sorry.(not in the tone of Eddie Murphy) I made a huge mistake. I said worm changed into frog? I skipped the others (not the movie) between frog and worm. Please enlighten us; what is the evolution tree is and how it starts and how it ends; Would you please draw a diagram or a list like A SIMPLIFIED ONE;

1.Worm _____frog _______ elephant ____________.....................................
There you go we are here, human beings.

Really when look at the evolution tree, I feel quite lost (worse than the ones in tv series, LOST)

Cheers.

P.S Josh, the more you ban, the more I win. Good riddance. I know Mr dawkins is pushing you rather than answering me, but, do not take the orders if you do not want to. Let people speak. There is freedom. Moreover, Dawkins's approach is so tempting. If he does not want to get teased, he better not to tease.

64. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #234052 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 8:00 pm

Who killed the dinasours?

Definetely, chemical rains(!)

Jamcam007 Sorry I missed you(i mean not literally)
You don't need to. It is above your IQ level. Yet if you don't understand, my gifted class students are ready to help you. Whatever i wrote so far, i shared with my students. They laugh a lot and at the same time, they are learning how illogical evolution is.

65. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #234046 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 7:45 pm

(After reading Isthatclear's nonsensical rant all I can say is this, "We are going to win".)

Is banning the comments winning? That is fair(!)Play fair?

(RD seems to become clearer with every talk and every q&a ... amazing guy ... )

Not with me. He is running away or being evasive? Can he dare to answer my questions?

66. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #234041 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 7:40 pm

Questions and Answers

Student: Dear Professor Reason, Mr dawkins says, how God can hear all the prayers of 6 billion people?

Professor Reason: People talk as much as they believe. Let me tell you an analogy. You just enter a very big palace. The palace is protected very well. Heater, lights, food, fruits, water and even communication are perfect. When people talk, they can communicate through air particulars. You just thought that the designer should be very knowledgeable. While you are thinking that way, one guy in the corner, stomping on his feet, screaming "the palace has no designer. No design in this palace. Means of coincidences, selfish genes, menotthinking, bllindwatchmaker, Boeing 747 is built by itself, "along with two old men; one keeps repeating not enough evidence and the one keep looking at the mirror, at his eye by saying " I am genius, I have to think of some stories about the eye."

Our earth is like a big palace with its atmosphere, seven layer shield, lights like stars and moon, heater like sun which is located at perfect distance, not to close not too far away, factory like soil, in a piece of soil, you can grow countless fruits and vegetables, trees like a servant like branches give us different fruits, people can communicate by means of telephone through air particulars. Now If one says the designer have the system as well that He can hear all the residences' requests, is it really difficult to believe it? Is it really difficult to believe that Designer who designed the entire palace like earth cannot hear us anytime?

Even today, in the space or on the earth, human beings can have the equipment to track down the conversations and watch the people from the space, again using the air particulars' help.

No need to say that guy who screams is Mr Dawkins and atheists.

Student: Dear Professor Reason, Mr dawkins says, Genes are selfish so they can adapt etc, what do you say?
Professor Reason: Selfish genes are really one of the funny ideas of ET. To me, selfish are not genes but GENIES who can do anything , but it just happens in fairy stories. Today scientifically, there is no such a thing that is proved. And there is no scientific person to accept this funny story except the horse man and their followers.

Student: Dear Professor Reason, Mr dawkins says, If God is complex, then, it does not exist.

Professor Reason: He is playing WITH the words; Let me PLAY THE WORDS.

If someone is standing behind an idea like ET, check the evolution tree, he should not mention the complex things. God's design is in harmony and design. Look at the universe! Can you find any fault or imperfection.

Evolution is not even complex. Because complex things require logic and reason and since ET does not have them, thus it can be called just a fairy story with genies.

No need to applause. Thank you.

67. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #234040 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 7:39 pm

LECTURE AT THE REASON UNIVERSITY to Mr Dawkins.

A lecture vs another lecture.

The atheists often use the science as if science has proved the ET(not movie, it is Evolution Theory) that it was right. So they need the science as a curtain to cover the illogical foundation in ET.

Home schooling is not bad because, at home, kids learn that they did not come from a worm.
Anyway except high school shootings the schools are free from ET.

Child farm is a very scary idea of an atheist mind. Thank God. We have just a few atheists all over the world.

Playing with children' pictures and being funny is not enough to prove that we came from the planets. Let's have fun indeed.

Indoctrinate the children or being outsmarted by them?

Junior 1: what are you doing here?
Junior 2: I am waiting my water worm to be A FROG..
Junior 1: Are you nuts? You got to CATCH it yourself.
Junior 2: No! Mr Dawkins told me that I have to wait for the evolution to make it a frog..
Junior 1: Did he say "how long you will have to wait for?
Junior 2: No?
Junior 1: I am kidding. Just leave it. Let's go to the movies.
Junior 2: But he will be angry if I don't tell the result?
Junior 1: Okay come with me. (he catches a frog) there you go it is done.
Junior 2: Let me take it to him.

Junior 2: Mr dawkins, it is done. You are right. Evolution is a fact.
Dawkins (stomping on his feet) I knew it. I was right. I give you A plus. Good boy.
Junior 2. Thank you Mr dawkins.

Junior 1: How did it go?
Junior 2: Perfect. I got an A plus.
Junior 1: Everybody did the same in class. They caught it but they said, evolution did it. Let's go to the movies.
Junior 2: Which movie is on?
Junior 1: Ben Stein.

Who killed the asteroids? Evolution of course. Sorry natural selection, but they were so strong and should be survived. May be selfish genes But Genes are selfish and they raised the consciousness, then, they are so small. Oh god I am confused now, may be I can check the evolution tree. But last time I came in, I could not go out.

Should we be offended as reasonable and scientific people when somebody says we came from a worm?

68. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #234039 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 7:36 pm

To Richard Dawkins

Mr Dawkins do not order JOsh to ban my comments. If you dare answer my question? While you are teasing 6 billion believers except a few atheits, it is not hurting but when I tease your ideas, it is hurting.

If you don't get teased, do not tease.

Raise consciousness. Google the truth

In your lecture, you clamed that only eight believers but anyone who can google can find the SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, an objective one. So why are you lying? Will it help to prove that we came from the worm? The same distortion is for the population of the atheists in the states. Prove me if I am wrong.

The believers who received Noble prizes.

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_Nobel.html

Atheists and agnostics comprise 12% of adults nationwide (in the states). (2004)

Quoted from:
http://atheism.about.com/b/2004/12/02/how-many-atheists-in-america.htm
In respect to the atheist population of the world, there have been many studies in regards to the atheist demographics and in regards to the percentage of atheists in various geographic areas. In regards to the atheist population as a percentage of various countries' populations, specific research on atheists conducted in 2006 suggests that the true proportion of atheists is 4% in the United States, 17% in Great Britain and 32% in France. A survey published in the 2005 Encyclopedia Britannica stated that 2.3% of the world's population consists of individuals who profess "atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious."[1] In regards to the 2.3% figure just mentioned, the 2005 survey cited by Encyclopedia Britannica survey did not include Buddhist in regards to the 2.3% figure and Buddhism can be theistic or atheistic.[2][3]

Quoted from:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheist_Population

69. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #233619 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 5:39 am

Questions and Answers

Student: Dear Professor Reason, Mr dawkins says, how God can hear all the prayers of 6 billion people?

Professor Reason: People talk as much as they believe. Let me tell you an analogy. You just enter a very big palace. The palace is protected very well. Heater, lights, food, fruits, water and even communication are perfect. When people talk, they can communicate through air particulars. You just thought that the designer should be very knowledgeable. While you are thinking that way, one guy in the corner, stomping on his feet, screaming "the palace has no designer. No design in this palace. Means of coincidences, selfish genes, menotthinking, bllindwatchmaker, Boeing 747 is built by itself, "along with two old men; one keeps repeating not enough evidence and the one keep looking at the mirror, at his eye by saying " I am genius, I have to think of some stories about the eye."

Our earth is like a big palace with its atmosphere, seven layer shield, lights like stars and moon, heater like sun which is located at perfect distance, not to close not too far away, factory like soil, in a piece of soil, you can grow countless fruits and vegetables, trees like a servant like branches give us different fruits, people can communicate by means of telephone through air particulars. Now If one says the designer have the system as well that He can hear all the residences' requests, is it really difficult to believe it? Is it really difficult to believe that Designer who designed the entire palace like earth cannot hear us anytime?

Even today, in the space or on the earth, human beings can have the equipment to track down the conversations and watch the people from the space, again using the air particulars' help.

No need to say that guy who screams is Mr Dawkins and atheists.

Student: Dear Professor Reason, Mr dawkins says, Genes are selfish so they can adapt etc, what do you say?
Professor Reason: Selfish genes are really one of the funny ideas of ET. To me, selfish are not genes but GENIES who can do anything , but it just happens in fairy stories. Today scientifically, there is no such a thing that is proved. And there is no scientific person to accept this funny story except the horse man and their followers.

Student: Dear Professor Reason, Mr dawkins says, If God is complex, then, it does not exist.

Professor Reason: He is playing WITH the words; Let me PLAY THE WORDS.

If someone is standing behind an idea like ET, check the evolution tree, he should not mention the complex things. God's design is in harmony and design. Look at the universe! Can you find any fault or imperfection.

Evolution is not even complex. Because complex things require logic and reason and since ET does not have them, thus it can be called just a fairy story with genies.

No need to applause. Thank you. Truth does not need to be applaused.

For your information, a friend of mine at the Berkeley just told me that there was nobody in line outside for "no show tickets" at last minute. Confirm it please.

70. Q&A with Richard Dawkins after lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #233615 by isthatclear on August 20, 2008 at 5:34 am

LECTURE AT THE REASON UNIVERSITY to Mr Dawkins.

A lecture vs another lecture.

The atheists often use the science as if science has proved the ET(not movie, it is Evolution Theory) that it was right. So they need the science as a curtain to cover the illogical foundation in ET.

Home schooling is not bad because, at home, kids learn that they did not come from a worm.
Anyway except high school shootings the schools are free from ET.

Child farm is a very scary idea of an atheist mind. Thank God. We have just a few atheists all over the world.

Playing with children' pictures and being funny is not enough to prove that we came from the planets. Let's have fun indeed.

Indoctrinate the children or being outsmarted by them?

Junior 1: what are you doing here?
Junior 2: I am waiting my water worm to be A FROG..
Junior 1: Are you nuts? You got to CATCH it yourself.
Junior 2: No! Mr Dawkins told me that I have to wait for the evolution to make it a frog..
Junior 1: Did he say "how long you will have to wait for?
Junior 2: No?
Junior 1: I am kidding. Just leave it. Let's go to the movies.
Junior 2: But he will be angry if I don't tell the result?
Junior 1: Okay come with me. (he catches a frog) there you go it is done.
Junior 2: Let me take it to him.

Junior 2: Mr dawkins, it is done. You are right. Evolution is a fact.
Dawkins (stomping on his feet) I knew it. I was right. I give you A plus. Good boy.
Junior 2. Thank you Mr dawkins.

Junior 1: How did it go?
Junior 2: Perfect. I got an A plus.
Junior 1: Everybody did the same in class. They caught it but they said, evolution did it. Let's go to the movies.
Junior 2: Which movie is on?
Junior 1: Ben Stein.

Who killed the asteroids? Evolution of course. Sorry natural selection, but they were so strong and should be survived. May be selfish genes But Genes are selfish and they raised the consciousness, then, they are so small. Oh god I am confused now, may be I can check the evolution tree. But last time I came in, I could not go out.

Should we be offended as reasonable and scientific people when somebody says we came from a worm?

Raise consciousness. Google the truth

In your lecture, you clamed that only eight believers but anyone who can google can find the SCIENTIFIC TRUTH, an objective one. So why are you lying? Will it help to prove that we came from the worm? The same distortion is for the population of the atheists in the states. Prove me if I am wrong.

The believers who received Noble prizes.

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_Nobel.html

Atheists and agnostics comprise 12% of adults nationwide (in the states). (2004)

Quoted from:
http://atheism.about.com/b/2004/12/02/how-many-atheists-in-america.htm
In respect to the atheist population of the world, there have been many studies in regards to the atheist demographics and in regards to the percentage of atheists in various geographic areas. In regards to the atheist population as a percentage of various countries' populations, specific research on atheists conducted in 2006 suggests that the true proportion of atheists is 4% in the United States, 17% in Great Britain and 32% in France. A survey published in the 2005 Encyclopedia Britannica stated that 2.3% of the world's population consists of individuals who profess "atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious."[1] In regards to the 2.3% figure just mentioned, the 2005 survey cited by Encyclopedia Britannica survey did not include Buddhist in regards to the 2.3% figure and Buddhism can be theistic or atheistic.[2][3]

Quoted from:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheist_Population

71. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #232978 by isthatclear on August 19, 2008 at 1:41 am

Steve zara

are you a space a traveller? How far did you travel in space? If the space is not designed, how do you explain designed solar system? Please do not say there is no design in solar system, otherwise, you will make my gifted class laugh?

natural slection"
cow
sheep
lambs,
goats
ducks
rabbits
etc

are they natural selected? Or they are just luck to survive though they are very vulnerable?

72. Enemies of Reason: Available now on DVD!

Comment #232975 by isthatclear on August 19, 2008 at 1:35 am

What are the chances that we came from a worm?
What are the chances all fruits and vegetables were evolved?
What are the chances that chemical rains dropped and made a sea/

What are the chances that Dna happened in that seas by chances?

What are the chances that Mr dawkins would take a month not to write and talk about evolution? Ir is so tiring for him. Sometimes i have a pity on him. If I were him, I would get a life. What the heck is that I have been spending my life to prove that i came from a water worm.

The lion of Reason tore the head of evolution already though the force-field of numberless articles and their defenders.

Take it easy and don't think about me.

73. Richard Dawkins Lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #232963 by isthatclear on August 19, 2008 at 1:25 am

sill waiting for question and answer session video?

74. A flea we missed?

Comment #232957 by isthatclear on August 19, 2008 at 1:16 am

flip a coin?

heads: Dna was created by God

tails: Evolution was not even a theory just a piece of funny story that is full of assertaions and assumptions which are continuously repeated by m R dawkins day and night.

75. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #232270 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 10:06 pm

(If one sees a painter creating a painting, one can say the next painting one sees has been painted by a painter.)

(If one sees a creator creating a universe, one can say the next universe one sees has been created by a creator.)

Brian, you are getting funnier and funnier. Let's go with the flow.

Are you all right?

Okay, did you see how you were developed in your mother's womb? In nine months, you were out as one good designed baby? Coincidences, random chances, blindwatchmaker or selfish genes, or menotthinking?

Forestmist

Still you don't get it. A bacteria can adapt itself into the different environments and immune system of human beings.

But evolution claims a very big challenge and turn into another structure. A worm that ended in human beings? I hope you are clear?

Fraiser
How is it going? Are you enjoying yourself by describing yourself with bad words? Good riddance.

To Allan

Lol !
(During that time, even the worm that he keeps talking about would have learned more!)

There you go you proved that the worms are the ancestors of human being.
Is Romania my country? I did not know that. Last time I became Russian.

Allan, you go play with Rubik's cube and do it. Or if you want to prove evolution, just leave the cube alone and wait for it to be done by itself means of coincidences(MR Dawkins) if you prove that way, I will quit writing. How does it sound? Fair?

76. Enemies of Reason: Available now on DVD!

Comment #232239 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 9:24 pm

To cold lazaraus

Okay let's make a test. You give all data to the computer and ask what are the odds that A DNA can happen by itself/ random chances?

Do you accept the challnge?

Second, Mr dawkins says very lately by means of coinsidences? Now we are all confused?

Please roll the dice and answer me along with the random chances description in real sense not with playing with words?

You know what? I am playing the words very intelligently but you play WITH the words, that is why you cannot win any argument against me.

Anyway, roll the dice.

77. A flea we missed?

Comment #232231 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 9:11 pm

(Did I give you the impression that I wasted my youth with religious studies?
Well, not in the least. Although I am from a catholic country, I smelled bs very early in life and never went to Sunday school - luckily, it wasn't compulsory.)

To decius

The wrong applications and attitudes at some churches can have a bad influence on children. But this fact should not be a childhood blockage to the creation of God, to the truth. It is like leaving a ship, a wrong ship, by dropping yourself into the sea of athiesm that sinks the poor minds. Instead you can take a boat of commonsense and board on another ship, the right one.

78. Richard Dawkins Lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #232222 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 8:58 pm

Sorry just my curiosity; why did you put the question and answer session along with the lecture? Do you need to work on it?

79. Richard Dawkins Lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #232219 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 8:56 pm

To Mr Dawkins

Is there any partial censorship on question and answer part of your video? I mean any smart and intelligent berkeley students asked and you puzzled, hesitated, sweated and dodged the question with an atheistic humor? How can be sure of that? We are watching the whole session or censored one?

80. Richard Dawkins Lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #232214 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 8:47 pm

To J mac
(IsThatClear is a fucking wack-job lunatic with less sense than a steaming pile of horse shit whose mother should have swallowed!)

Bad words describe the person who pops up them.
Atheists minds are working this way, as a sign of their desperate state of mind, they start swearing.

Anyway, talking about my passed away mum is describing atheists in a good way; How pathetic they are. Good riddance. Spill up more.

T

81. Richard Dawkins Lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #231992 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 11:55 am

(Simply not worth any other response)

to reply my comments in the same way using both humor and logic requires a high IQ so you can't.

82. Enemies of Reason: Available now on DVD!

Comment #231990 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 11:51 am

( really can't believe that people STILL bang on about 'chance', and 'coincidence'. If they don't understand evolution to that extent... why are they so bothered about talking about it?)

really? I am offended now. Please tell us what evolution is if it is not luck, chances unexplainable complex things, coincidences or blindwathmaker, selfish and conscious(!) genes, MENOTTHINKING then what is then?
before we knock on the door of reason tell us?

83. Richard Dawkins Lecture at UC Berkeley

Comment #231926 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 10:21 am

Abusing of Junior's mind

Junior 1: what are you doing here?
Junior 2: I am waiting my Rubik's cube is done.
Junior 1: Are you nuts? You got to do it yourself.
Junior 2: No! The new Biology teacher Mr Dawkins told me that I have to wait for the coincidences to make Rubik's cube is done. He said " it will happen the same way DNA was made in the first place.
Junior 1: Did he say "how long you will have to wait for?
Junior 2: No?
Junior 1: I am kidding. Just leave it. Let's go to the movies.
Junior 2: But he will be angry if I don't tell the result?
Junior 1: Okay give it tome. (five minutes later) there you go it is done.
Junior 2: Let me take it to him.

Junior 2: Mr dawkins, it is done. You are right. There was a sudden sand storm and in five minutes, cube is done.

Dawkins (stomping on his feet) I knew it. I was right. I give you A plus. Good boy.
Junior 2. Thank you Mr dawkins.

Junior 1: How did it go?
Junior 2: Perfect. I got an A plus.
Junior 1: everybody did the same in class. They made it but they said, coincidences. Let's go to the movies.
Junior 2: Which movie is on?
Junior 1: Evolution.

The name Mr Dawkins is just a coincidence. It has nothing to do with the one at the Berkeley, who gave a lecture to the students with the blank looks..

84. A flea we missed?

Comment #231821 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 6:41 am

this is so tempting.

Whitepearl

I told you to hold magazines now you did not listen to me.See what you are holding now?

85. A flea we missed?

Comment #231815 by isthatclear on August 17, 2008 at 6:38 am

Breaking news

A man turned into a flea. Evolution was proved.

Two fleas are talking;

Flea 1: Did you hear about this Dawkins guy?

Flea 2: The one who writes, talks and gets interview day and night to prove that we come from the water worm that came from the DNA which happened out of chemical rains which rained from the planets from the space and all these things happened by just means of coincidences.

Flea1: Wow what a story? It makes me feel scratchy.

Flea 2: Tell me about it. I forget to do my nature of job when I read these guys' stories. There's more. When this dawkins guys is stuck or faces any challenge from the side of creation, he uses our names to give nickname to the believers.

Flea 1: What are we gonna do with this Dawkins guys?

Flea 2: Let him spill up more.

Flea 1: But I feel itchier when I hear more about his vain efforts to prove that me and elephant are related. He is like a flea to me.

Flea 2: But we are supposed to make people feel itchy.

Flea 1: But he is now like a flea that makes fleas itchy.

Flea 1: Take is easy. May be we can buy a flea repeller. There is a new brand called "Reason repels it"

Flea 2: It is ironic right. When he uses us to defeat creation, he ignores our beautiful designed structure and self-enjoys his delusional victory but refutes himself and evolution while he is using us. He is not aware of it, is he?

Flea 2: Nope! Blindness and stubborness are the worst curtains in mind and reason. Oh my God the ground is moving?

Flea 1: Come on! It is just the elephant we reside on. It is moving. You are so funny.

Flea 2: Oh man. I am so scared.

Flea 1: Take it easy. Just scratch your back, and lie down. Let's watch Ben Stein Movie. It is so funny.

Flea jokes

What is the difference between an elephant and a flea?
An elephant can have fleas but a flea can't have elephants!

What is the difference between reason and evolution?
Reason does not have evolution but delusion can have it.

86. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #231272 by isthatclear on August 16, 2008 at 4:40 am

Brian, if you cannot see the design in the universe and designed creatures and in us, just watch the movie, evolution.

Cheers.

Irate, Belle parole non pascono i gatti.
Dinner is ready.
To the whitepearl

You know what? I am leaving you alone not because of your holding your bat instead of magazines or because of your so-called sense of humor that makes me laugh two days later for the courtesy of mine, because , but just because of Quetz. He asked me to do so. Have fun.

The reason I asked al rawandi does not apply to your IQ level. Take it easy.

By the way, I am so sorry that I asked you to read magazines? I am really so sorry. I mean it. Even not in the tone of Eddy Murphy.

Quetz

How many people make a spelling mistake all over the world in one minute?
What about coding mistakes in DNA? Accidentally? Coincidentally?

Forestmist

Superbug mutated and this is your proof that proves millions of creatures came from a worm? Gimme a break. You and me and entire world knows that viruses or bugs' adaptation has got nothing to do with evolution.

We are talking about an ancestor worm and great great … grandson, elephant? Does it ring the bell?

87. Enemies of Reason: Available now on DVD!

Comment #231234 by isthatclear on August 16, 2008 at 3:35 am

Enemies of seeing and thinking 2

(Dawkins has realized that he can get nowhere with the scenario of chance. But, he is now in the logical impasse as he basically claims that "evolution cannot be a result of coincidences, but has occurred by means of coincidences." What he should realize is that demagogy no longer works.)

By means of coincidence?

Delusion/evolution 1

There are many jars of different ingredients in the shelves; they are all for making a medicine in certain amounts. Then suddenly strong wind opened windows of the pharmacy and knocked out some of the jars off the shelves, then, there you go with the help of coincidence, ingredients coincidentally were mixed on the floor with the certain amounts and the correct jars of medicine; we got a medicine.

What a coincidence!

Delusion/evolution 2

The name of the book; genome. How did it happen?

The letters(happened coincidentally out of chemical rains, yep believe me.) of Genome were in the sea. Then, a very big storm bore out and all the letters of Genome accidentally or coincidentally came together. There you go, the book of genome came out.

What a coincidence!

Let me check my Rubik's cube is done by itself coincidentally or not. I have been waiting for a week. Nothing happened. Do I need any means of coincidence, Mr Dawkins?

88. Enemies of Reason: Available now on DVD!

Comment #230582 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 10:56 pm

Enemies of Seeing and Thinking

There are two kinds of people of the world �" the ones with faith in God and the ones with no faith �" just a few - the atheists.

Atheists' eyes cannot go up to the level of thinking, rather than sticking with " I see I believe" limited state of mind. In other words, Their eyes of mind lowered to their physical eyes. They struggle a lot to prove that they came from chemical rains. So much struggle that they publish articles day and night just only prove that universe has no design and millions of species came from a lovely worm. If you consider how illogical evolution it is, then, you can understand their very much struggle to prove otherwise.

Their evolution idea is based on a millions of assumptions following each other and if the first assumption does not occur, there you go, the idea is gone forever. Thus it was.

They try to profit every single fake or fabricated fossils by slandering and distorting the truth to prove all vegetables, fruits, trees, factory like soil just evolved.

Reason and logic cannot involve in evolution since the idea of evolution is based on pure assumptions which is not linked to science.

Still the struggle of atheism goes on while it retreats from society more and more while they struggle more. The more atheism struggles the more it retreats from the society. The way to the commonsense is only one which requires to believe that an arts needs an artist not the luck and chances.

If the reason and science are like a circle, and then creation circles the reason and science. What evolution is trying to do is to take a place in that big circle by wiping out the creation. But the problem is that the circle of creation is safeguarded by reason and logic which do not allow evolution to step inside the circle. They will never.

89. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #230565 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 10:20 pm

Brian brains up again:

(I have seen paint, canvas and painters creating paintings so I can infer from similar paintings.)

Me too. I can see 400 hundred thousand species, (paintings) with different canvas, colours and designs. I also can see the universe and solar system with perfect design.

(Have you ever seen a universe designed before?)

I do not need to. There is a palace like earth and universe designed for us. That I do not/cannot see the maker NOW does not mean that I should deny the design and say, evolution did it. Art requires artist not random chances and blind blindwatcmaker. Design requires designer whether we can see the Designer or not.

You cannot see your mind but it proves that you have mind. Otherwise I will call you mindless since I do not see it. Clear?

What about you? Did you see any mutation, evolution of any animal? I say there is a design and this is my proof? Where is your proof?

(It's quite simple, unless you've seen the designer of the universe you can't claim design.)

Unless you have never seen any animal's evolution, you can't claim that evolution.

I do not need to see the artist of an art to believe that art is made by the artist since the art itself proves that it needs an artist to be made.

(We see the universe, we see no designer, we no designs, we seen no other universe that has been designed.)

A man is a small universe; If you do not consider yourself designed, go and watch some monster movies.

To pathetic person/sorry I slipped/ apathy personified

Analyze this:
(How can you argue against evolution, if you don't know the first thing about it - go to your local library, take out a REAL SCIENCE book on evolution, teach yourself to read big words, then read the book.)

Analyze that:
yes i can since i am reasonable. Can i ask a personal question? What is your job?

Vaal

Oh vala. Yeah you're right. Evolution is not based on reason and logic.

To Philip:

If we go for apology, then, most of you owe me an apology. But just forget about it. However, you owe a very big apology to REASON and LOGIC since you bring up an evolution idea that completely offends them. We can start with you Philip.

(just remember to wear a condom, there's a good boy)

Incredible(s) It is amazing that some atheists cannot go up any level of discussion more than conXXX level. Is this scientific or educational? Nope just atheistic. The vocabulary and level of talking surely reflects the talker's state of mind and sometimes level of IQ. It is like if you play basketball constantly, then, you will talk about basketball very often with the related vocabulary? Clear?

Oh man athieism is dying before it is born.

90. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #229835 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 3:54 am

Queatz

hold your horses" why do you defend the whitepearl? Hmm anoither web page accident? I feel funny now and again? Where is al rawandi?

Look pal? I never insulted anyone their logic but you do. And go read magazies is not insulting? How many women are there in the world that they are not reading fashion magazines? It is better than swearing.

So why do you defend pearl?

91. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #229829 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 3:47 am

(I have done a little psychoanalysis on you)

Analyze me is my favorite movie. Wow i am impressed. what about anayze this:

Our ancestors are the water worms.
Blindwatcmaker is not blind so are luck and c hances.
Chemiocal rain accidentally rained and blindwatcmaker caused the DNA to happen accidentally like rubik's cube is done by accidentally?

Oh man? this is killing me. This blindness and ignorance and stubborness is killing me.

you gotta better answer than go read a book while you fail to read the book of universe. That is ironic. (alanis M.)

92. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #229823 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 3:39 am

Quetzalcoal

Moron

to me Moron means to believe something that humans came from a worm? Don't you think? (Alanis Morisette)

Billys(t)ands stands on evolution tree.

(Sorry mate, I dont speak retard. Could you maybe draw it or something?)

Please look at the evolution tree. Nice draw.. I don't believe in retard ideas either.

my favorite.

http://images.google.com.hk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dhushara.com/book/evol/trevol.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.dhushara.com/book/evol/evol.htm&h=2191&w=1513&sz=785&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=WK3hQdYPAFtuuM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=104&prev=/images?q=evolution tree&um=1&complete=1&hl=en&sa=X

93. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #229820 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 3:36 am

The white pearl gets dark pearl
(I really don't have anything to say to that. I think I've been sitting here for ten minutes just trying to come up with something clever..But I cant...You're a half-brained, fucking moron. An insult to the human race. That comment you made in regards to me was so incredibly third grade I wouldn't even do you the justice of hitting you with a cricket bat.)

This is what happens when white pearl does not read fashion magazines. See that? Oh My god. She is losing it. I can't imagine her with a bat chasing me with the swearing words. No, I can't be.

What about this? Hittting evolution with the logic of bat? So far I did. And what I have as defense of atheists is:

Swearing and insulting and smearing, distorting and being censored. That fits in evolution bit not in science and education.

White pearl
Take my advice and read magazines. Go to the movies like I am totally clueless or city of angels. Relax.

No worries I am not insulted since the bad words belong to the owner it pops up.

A buon intenditor poche parole.
A ciascuno il suo.
A mali estremi, estremi rimedi.

To fraser
(isthatclear - no, it's not.)
Not a chance

94. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #229784 by isthatclear on August 14, 2008 at 3:07 am

(Isthatclear, you say that we can know that a house is designed by a person because we have seen the designer. How can you say the universe is designed if we have not seen a person designing it?)

Brian English you keep asking the same question, but anyway I can make it celar for you again.

If you don't see the designer of a designed structure, that means, it happened by itself or "blind" blind watchmaker?

If you did not meet maker ,Da vnci,, then, you will say Mona Lisa came out by evolution of black colour which was rained from the planets?

To steve Zara

First my gifted class challenged Dawkins already but he can't afford an answer. He instead started making a program about kids using reverse psychology and so-called atheist humor. Good riddance.

Second

Your mind is focused on which God , how, when etc, typical low IQ questions.
Your case is similar to the one who looks in the mirror and say "mirror mirro tell me who created me so perfectly? God or I came from a worm?

Or looking at the solar system and see the perfect design there and then, Who created it? God or evolution?
You can link creation to reason and science. But you cannot link evolution to reason and science.

There is no lesson at schools like evolution that we can do the experiments like changing a worm into a frog or whatever it is in the jungle of evolution tree.

Steve zara you do the same thing do not ask same VAIN questions

Did u get the clue about what I am saying? Clueless? That is okay. It is just the state of an atheist mind?

Is that clear?

Philip
(Why not go away? Nobody likes you.)

It is really hurting to hear that nobody likes me. Does it really matter? We are here not to like each other but just discuss how logical evolution idea is? I have no intentions to make friends with anyone on this page though I have got atheist friends in my life.

When Mr Dawkins says, okay guys I was wrong. I mislead you and others. I am mistaken. There is no logic and reason in evolution. I am deluded and let you get deluded. I am sorry. This web page is no longer in service. It is closed down. Then everything will be over.

The white pearl and cricket bat? I asked her to hold fashion magazines already.

Irate gets irate again.

(Indeed. The ignorant masses spout total wank and are offended when their imbecility is shown up for what it is. Cretins, most of 'em.)

I am fine irate how are u? You don't look good? Therapy, fishing, sleeping, doing some sports may help.

95. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #229010 by isthatclear on August 13, 2008 at 2:38 am

Evolins exchange their jokes by ensuring that they are not deluded. What a waste?

(Asking questions you do not know the answer to does not disprove evolution!!!!!!}

Do we have to disprove evolution? Or it is self-refuting?

(isthatclear = wooter)

You are very smart(!) I guess Josh can answer it. He is the most famous censurer in google.

I would like to say "retard= billlysands" but I would not so I will not since the bad words belong to the mouth that pops up.

(Because frankly your posts seem barely literate and barely coherent.)

Oh pal, if you stand for a funny idea that worms are our ancestors, I would not criticize someone as coherent.

(Everyone else, I am off to Mexico for the greatest week of fishing in sunny Baja California)

Fishing for DNA IN THE LITTLE POND escorting Darwin?

(I mean, just because he's right doesn't mean he's allowed to say the truth. It's upsetting you know!)

"Just because he thinks that he is right but he is not so he does not know" does not mean that he is not allowed to attack in a very clever way, so called clever, not to me.

(I hope Richard will hit back.)

Richard dawkins hits back but not directly(except once, he swore to Ben Stein). For example, if you mention that the students clear minds cannot take evolution, then, there you go, he is already there making a program for kids. He is very smart in his own way but not smart enough to outsmart me and the believers.

(Who do I contact to get an explanation for being censored?)

Oh dear they are at it again. I guess you mentioned something reasonable that they are offended and failed to defend evolution mock. Sorry this is the fate of this web page. No worries, you will get used to it. Even Dawkins asked dear josh to delete my challenging. This is typical

To Thewhitepear

Can I ignore you? Please. I cant find any solid points to write back to you. What about fashion magazines?

96. Richard Dawkins replies to Libby Purves

Comment #228377 by isthatclear on August 12, 2008 at 1:28 am

A second open letter to Mr Dawkins,

(as stark as any bonkers tin-hut preacher from the Quivering Brethren shouting: 'Repent or burn!' Evolution or God �" take your choice, kid! The moment one of them found an ammonite on the beach, Professor Dawkins demanded instant atheism")

Reason or delude; creation or delusion; take your choice, people (not Kids; they are too smart to believe in evolution)

Mr, Dawkins, as you are inspired from my comments, you started trying to influence (or I would say bug ) the kids with your vain attempts. Let me clear it for you;
The students' minds are clearer than ours. So they think clearly about the matters they study on. Whenever I mentioned evolution in my class, they always raised the same questions:

How did the earth started on the first place?
How did the chemical rain start?
How did the first DNA happen? It is the same funny idea that Rubik's cube is done by itself if you say the first DNA happened by itself or chances or (blind) blind watchmaker.

Evolution is based on random chances and luck, but creation is based on science and logic.

The funniest part is that my gifted class starts teasing our so-called ancestor worm; they are really funny.

I guess I cleared the mess that happened while I was spending my holiday in Turkey.

My trip to Turkey

Turkey is really a beautiful country with their beautiful sea sides and scenes and historical places. People do not wear Capri pants in general. Democracy is a common key. People live their religion as much as they believe. No pushing and interference. There are also Jewish and Christian people living in the country for a long time with their Turkish citizenship but still go to their own churches and sinagogs

So al-go-vain, people started to wear Capri pants all over the world but not because of religion but just for fashion. Oh My atheist mind, you are killing me softly.

97. Review interview: Richard Dawkins

Comment #224121 by isthatclear on August 4, 2008 at 6:34 am

The Genius of Charles Darwin begins on Channel 4 tomorrow at 8pm

hmm. If darwın were genıus then dawkıns would have been a belıever of the unıted states.

If dawkıns were genius ı could have been converted to an atheist on condition that ı would have lost my mind.

fun days are ahead.

98. Richard Dawkins on Al Jazeera English

Comment #218309 by isthatclear on July 25, 2008 at 7:56 am

my dear evolıns

ı am ın my holıday now ın turkey. i cannot answer your calls ındıvıdually. so take ıt easy and just help darwın and that not enough evıdence not enough evıdeence guy to fınd the dna ın the soup.

al rawandı
please do not look at the mırror when you swear.
by the way mr dawkıns. me and my students are stıll waıtıng for your reply.

rubık cube dna and what ıs the possıbılıty?

99. Richard Dawkins on Al Jazeera English

Comment #215457 by isthatclear on July 22, 2008 at 12:44 am

(How disturbing to hear a caller of a 21st century call-in show, saying "Islam says we come from Adam, peace be upon him, so we can't come from monkeys)

Not only islam but also Judaism and Christianity says the same thing.

Do you think It is reasonable to say " we came from the worms"? My beloved ancestor worm?

Matter cannot create matter

My Logic and reason says we cannot come from water worm that happened by chance and luck. Rubik's cube is a good analogy for DNAs to refute evolution theory. But my best is that letters are unable to write anything meaningful by themselves or being selfish �" I feel funny when I use this selfish genes.

We say we came from the first man and all the creations are created seperately. So you prove it otherwise if you can

If I have a heavy British accent, I would not be teasing a non native speaker's accent.

100. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup

Comment #215450 by isthatclear on July 22, 2008 at 12:21 am

The white pearl pearls(!)
(I don't understand the insult. I don't understand what he's trying to say. )

Laurie crazier
when i look at your picture
read your comment
equally fucked-up personalities,
I agree.

You have to be not blonde.

I need a wooter translator.

You need a high IQ

(Apparently it's easier for him to think of an insult for women. "Go look at a fashion magazine" and "girly talk with my peers" is the best he can do? )

When you talk, you make people understand that you don't have a high IQ so you better look at the magazines, or get married, establish a family.

(*shrugs shoulder* meh..whatever.. )

same here.

Return of REASON

RR.

Being irrational messed up indeed. I am clearing up.

So Mr Dawkins

Me and my students are still waiting your answer to our questions by applying to logic without being evasive by saying 'It is process or it is not luck and chance bur explainable random process stories"

Now I am gong to Turkey where dawkins is challenged and yet not dare to attempt to have a debate on BBC.