51. Evangelicals battle over agenda, environment

Comment #25649 by Roll on March 14, 2007 at 2:11 pm

This is all good. Divide and rule.

All the while fundies debate the finer points of doctrine, the greater influence the other side of the debate has in terms of policy.

I welcome the new Christian approach to global warming and HIV, even if it is for the wrong reasons, we can catch them on that one later...

52. The Dawkins Confusion: Naturalism ad absurdum

Comment #23580 by Roll on March 1, 2007 at 3:33 pm

Which god had the biggest penis? I need to know before I decide the correct religion for me...

53. The Dawkins Confusion: Naturalism ad absurdum

Comment #23535 by Roll on March 1, 2007 at 1:36 pm

It is almost unbelievable how much energy is wasted attempting to perpetuate this bollox.

Several notable theologians quoted: God is not complex, has no moving parts, is spirit, so is simple. Therefore God does not have to be more complex than that he created. Thanks, just brilliant! Having pointed that out to me, I just know all my education has been nothing but a sham.

54. Dawkins Delusion (3rd article, Same Stupid Title)

Comment #8491 by Roll on November 21, 2006 at 11:45 am

Heaven.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven

Well, that's clear then.