Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by irate_atheist


1151. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130162 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 6:40 am

584. Comment #130146 by The Bishop -

The Bible is the foremost authority on evolution.

Genesis 1 gives a good description of how it all came about....just without all the detail that modern scientist are uncovering.
Am I the only person here that's thinking, 'if they give The Bishop an enema, he could be buried in a matchbox'?

1152. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130145 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 6:24 am

570. Comment #130128 by The Bishop

don't think you have the courage!
Some of us have had the courage to rescue loved ones from fundamentalist cults. Christian retards who have people weeping on the floor because they're so bad and praying for forgiveness for practically every thought they have. Nutjobs who teach children about the earth being 6,000 years old. Twats who say evolution is nonsense because the bible says it ain't so. Functional psychotics who think they hear voices in their heads telling them what to do and encouraging children and vulnerable adults to do the same.

Don't talk to me about 'courage' - some of us have used more of our store of it than you can comprehend.

The book you refer to was written by ignorant men in ignorant times. It is only scary if you believe the tripe it contains. A bit difficult given its inaccuracies and self-contradictions.

Crap on your own lawn, not ours.

1153. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130126 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 5:58 am

566. Comment #130124 by Dr Benway -

Devote yourself to truth and love becomes possible. Devote yourself to love above truth, and you'll unwittingly waste your life in masturbation.
Don't knock masturbation; it's sex with someone I love. - Woody Allen

1154. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130120 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 5:50 am

562. Comment #130112 by Tyler Durden -

I've never encountered a talking snowman but I've got a door jam and tree bark. Woof woof.

1155. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130108 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 5:18 am

203. Comment #130105 by Steve Zara -

Well, it might confuse other people too. I dunno. It's a difficult judgement call.

1156. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130104 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 5:03 am

557. Comment #130095 by wooter -

Further to my comment elsewhere:

Irate, Lorien,
When you or if you come to the level of logic and science from the level of funny, give me a call.
I'm not being funny, you prick.
If I were you I would not dare to mention again the snowflakes. Because any objective reader of this web page may access into web pages that show the pictures of snowflakes which is surely self proving of designer. No need to talk about it or being funny. Snowflakes speak for themselves.
If you hear snowflakes speaking for themselves, either get your hearing checked or visit a psychiatrist. Seriously.

1157. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #130101 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 4:55 am

201. Comment #130097 by Steve Zara -

irate: Sorry, did not mean to steal your thunder, but wooter is back in the business of posting the same thing on multiple threads!
What's even better is that he's replying to my reply on this thread on the other thread. Perhaps I should do the same - a bit like the two Ronnies mastermind sketch where the specialist subject is answering the question before last. What do you think?

1158. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #130092 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 3:56 am

199. Comment #130088 by wooter -

How do you explain the working of stomach? Stomach can digest the meat by acid but it cannot harm itself because of the protective tissue covering inside of the stomach? How do you explain this evolution?
Ever heard of intestinal ulcers?
2.How come a reptile's legs turn into wings gradually but while this is happening how is that possible a half foot and half wing creature will survive? How logical is that we have a lot a lot of creatures like that- even not monsters and even in the movie ice age is not that bad?
What, like Archaeopteryx? http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/birds/archaeopteryx.html
3. ...our memory is a tinier than our finger nail?
Well, perhaps your brain's that small - and it would explain a lot - but most aren't.

1159. State Approves Evolution As 'Scientific Theory'

Comment #130081 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 3:34 am

In other news:

Texas housewife concedes 'world might not be flat, after all'.

CofE Bishop admits 'recent flooding probably due to rain, not gays'.

and finally

Vatican spokesman confesses 'yes, it was all an elaborate joke from the start'.

1160. Why do we believe in God? 2m study prays for answer

Comment #130067 by irate_atheist on February 20, 2008 at 2:50 am

38. Comment #129523 by Geoff on February -

Having said that, the answer "because they're fucktards" (with apologies to irate_atheist!) surely deserves the £1.9m. They can send the money to my PayPal account...
They're by no means all fucktards. Any apologies should be directed to Al-Rawandi, by the way.

P.S:

Can we share the cash anyway?

1161. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #129409 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 4:24 am

179. Comment #129404 by epeeist -

Good move, very good move.

I can't see an easy way out of this one.

Unless....North Greenwich?

Any flat-earthers out there?

1162. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #129403 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 4:09 am

177. Comment #129390 by epeeist -

Tricky, tricky. Trying to find the legal move.

Ponders.


Ponders more.

I'll go for South Kensington - close enough to the Natural History Museum to walk to it.

1163. Why Darwin matters

Comment #129400 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 4:06 am

491. Comment #129389 by Philip1978 -

I'm not so bad, thank you. Caught a stinker of a cold from irate_junior - but he's soooooo cute!!!!

Tea - always best enjoyed wth a good book and (lots of) chocolate biccies.


492. Comment #129395 by Roland_F -

Also the hyper creative God who is designing every snowflake differently , very busy God every time a cloud is ripe for snowfall God has to hurry and create all different snowflakes. Hilarious !
Yeah. Laugh - I nearly shat.

1164. Atheists An Increasingly Outspoken Minority

Comment #129391 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:51 am

26. Comment #129386 by AllanW -

For the record (no pun intended), he was world record holder for the triple jump.

He is no longer a christian...

http://www.secularism.org.uk/theapostasyofjonathanedwards.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Edwards_(athlete)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/more_sport/athletics/article1991114.ece

1165. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #129387 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:41 am

174. Comment #129384 by epeeist -

And, may I add, Oliver's army is here to stay.

1166. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #129385 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:37 am

174. Comment #129384 by epeeist -

Aha!!!! Cannon Street!

If only, if only...

1167. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #129383 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:35 am

171. Comment #129378 by wooter -

The liver also produces cholesterol and 'deals with' drugs, alcohol and toxins in the bloodstream.
But sometimes not well enough. A better design wouldn't result in people dying of alcohol poisoning or from eating the wrong mushroom or plant...

So evolution or incompetent designer. You choose.

1168. Why Darwin matters

Comment #129379 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:28 am

488. Comment #129373 by Philip1978 -

Hello!!!!

How are you!!!!!

1169. Atheists An Increasingly Outspoken Minority

Comment #129377 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:22 am

As a man of faith, Bishop Hanson still has a key question for those who don't believe in God.

"Where do you place your trust in times of need? Where do you place your hope in the time of a crisis of confidence?" Hanson said.
Er...perhaps I place it in getting off my arse and doing something about the 'situation' instead of asking the fairies to help.

Pathetic, wishful thinking, self-centred, self-pitying, ignorant tripe. No less than one would expect of a so-called 'grown-up' playing silly make-believe games with other peoples lives.

1170. Why Darwin matters

Comment #129367 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 3:00 am

484. Comment #129364 by wooter -

er...West Harrow? Perhaps?

1171. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #129338 by irate_atheist on February 19, 2008 at 1:45 am

164. Comment #129334 by wooter -

Ealing Broadway.

1172. US military accused of harboring fundamentalism

Comment #127420 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 8:57 am

10. Comment #127418 by Arcturus -

Nothing new, we've had Soldiers for Christ before.
And the Crusades.

Ohhhh, the times they are a changin'...

1173. US military accused of harboring fundamentalism

Comment #127419 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 8:54 am

4. Comment #127408 by wednesdayguevara

6. Comment #127410 by Quetzalcoatl

Thank you, thank you so much.

The relief is palpable.

1174. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127415 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 8:52 am

281. Comment #127400 by The Reverend Dark -

I couldn't possbily listen to the debate.

My head would explode.

1175. US military accused of harboring fundamentalism

Comment #127403 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 8:42 am

Someone, please, use the word before I'm forced to.

1176. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127389 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 8:17 am

276. Comment #127381 by Philip1978 -

1st - Pudding Mill Lane
2nd - wash your mouth out after saying Mc...

1177. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127370 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 7:54 am

268. Comment #127365 by Philip1978 -

Victoria. (Yes, I know it's a mainline too, but I like taking risks)

1178. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127367 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 7:49 am

267. Comment #127362 by Steve Zara-

Hesitation (Previous post was 10 minutes ago.)

1179. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127344 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 7:08 am

247. Comment #127340 by Philip1978 -

You cheeky young rapscallion!!!!

I'll go to...Dagenham Heathway.

How do you like that!?

1180. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127339 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 7:02 am

244. Comment #127337 by annabanana -

?

1181. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127336 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 7:01 am

239. Comment #127331 by Henri Bergson -

Not playing your strange games here, but I'm actually popping out to Gloucester Road. (Does this mean something here?)
It doesn't necessarily mean anything - unless you're planning on using Gunnersby as your next move - in which case you must beware of leaving open the diagonal approach to Green Park.

1182. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127330 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:51 am

229. Comment #127321 by Steve Zara -

Ssh...don't tell him and he won't notice.

1183. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127328 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:50 am

234. Comment #127326 by Philip1978 -

OK If you're going to be like that...

Monument.

1184. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127325 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:48 am

231. Comment #127323 by Henri Bergson -

...I didn't realise this forum was all about reading about your changing moods and taste in clothes.
I'm a techie. I don't have any taste in clothes...

1185. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127319 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:43 am

224. Comment #127316 by Henri Bergson -

If we're all in London, we could settle this dispute with an arm-wrestle. I'm in Kensington if anyone fancies a debate over beer...
Like others before you, you're mistaking this forum for some kind of mass-debating society.

1186. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127317 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:40 am

223. Comment #127315 by Quetzalcoatl -

Aha!!

Mornington Crescent.

1187. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127313 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:36 am

220. Comment #127310 by Quetzalcoatl -

Good move! I can only take Kilburn Park from there.

1188. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127309 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:34 am

217. Comment #127307 by Philip1978 -

Splitter!

1189. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127308 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:33 am

213. Comment #127302 by gcdavis -

Hang on, weren't the South Circular Rules banned in 1983?

No - you must be thinking of the South & Central rules that were finally banned in 1982. South Circular is fine if you avoid St James's Park from the East.

1190. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127303 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:30 am

210. Comment #127299 by gcdavis -

Hmmm...

Highbury & Islington (?)

1191. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127297 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:27 am

205. Comment #127293 by gcdavis -

Holland Park

1192. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127294 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:26 am

202. Comment #127290 by gcdavis =

Irate_Atheist says: I prefer to play South Circular Rules with Fullham Broadway and Shadwell as wildcards. Finchley Road cannot be approached from the South.

1193. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127291 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:22 am

196. Comment #127283 by PhilG -

PhilG said: Sounds like some abstract euphemism. "Fancy a bit of Mornington Crescent then, love?"

Irate_Atheist says: Shepherd's Bush

1194. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127279 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:06 am

Irate_Atheist challenges Henri to a game of Mornington Crescent.

1195. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127277 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 6:05 am

Irate_Atheist rejoins the thread.

Irate_Atheist opens the cupboard. He picks up the map and the coil of rope.

1196. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127273 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 5:47 am

Irate_Atheist leaves the thread.

1197. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127268 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 5:45 am

Irate_Atheist has stolen the cup of tea from Quetzlcoatl.

1198. Why Darwin matters

Comment #127265 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 5:42 am

315. Comment #127174 by Quetzalcoatl -

Wooter, number one enemy
My, you have a high opinion of yourself! :-)
The original is a typographical error. Should be: Wooter, number one enema.

1199. Debate between Richard Dawkins and Madeline Bunting

Comment #127262 by irate_atheist on February 15, 2008 at 5:36 am

Irate_Atheist stands in the corner, observing.

1200. Why Darwin matters

Comment #126722 by irate_atheist on February 14, 2008 at 3:20 am

299. Comment #126713 by Geoff -

not the word(s) I was expecting!
Did you seriously think that I was going to rise to the bait and write fucktard in this part of the thread? They won't catch me out that easily, no sir, they won't.

More Pages: Previous | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 | Next