Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by irate_atheist


1352. Ben Stein Bribing Schools to See His Anti-Evolution Movie 'Expelled'

Comment #112925 by irate_atheist on January 18, 2008 at 9:34 am

90. Comment #112923 by al-rawandi -

Aim for the gutter and you'll land on the pavement. That's my motto in life.

1353. Ben Stein Bribing Schools to See His Anti-Evolution Movie 'Expelled'

Comment #112917 by irate_atheist on January 18, 2008 at 9:23 am

84. Comment #112903 by al-rawandi -

You are now officially classy.
Upper, middle or lower?

1355. The Group Delusion

Comment #112460 by irate_atheist on January 17, 2008 at 7:10 am

236. Comment #112432 by _J_ -

wooter, please don't take all this personally.
No, please. Take this personally.

1356. Huckabee Wants A 'Faith-based' Constitution

Comment #112457 by irate_atheist on January 17, 2008 at 7:06 am

114. Comment #112286 by Kergillian -

Fortunately I don't.

:-)


!!!!!

1357. The Group Delusion

Comment #112428 by irate_atheist on January 17, 2008 at 4:40 am

223. Comment #112405 by epeeist -

I'm doing the same. Josh's Inbox must be full to bursting by now.

1358. Huckabee Wants A 'Faith-based' Constitution

Comment #112058 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 8:58 am

"When fascism comes to America it will come wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."
-Sinclair Lewis

1359. The Group Delusion

Comment #112048 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 8:47 am

190. Comment #112041 by mesomodel -

The theist brain is just stuck at the age of six. By the time they hear that god is a myth, it's too late.
Add to that the fact that most will have been told it's true by their prime care-givers who may well seem sane, rational, normal to them, no matter how bat-shit crazy their religious upbringing was.

1360. Science, Evolution, and Creationism

Comment #112022 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 8:11 am

10. Comment #112018 by ianmkz -

I think that might go down well with Huckabee and his kind; "I am better than a chimpanzee."
Are you seriously suggesting that Huckabee is better than a chimpanzee?

1361. Science, Evolution, and Creationism

Comment #112019 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 8:07 am

7. Comment #112006 by Pilot22A -

More like "the inability of scientists to be honest and challenge all religious belief."

Some like Dawkins and Pinker do, some others are fudgers, liars or deluded.

1363. Canadian fossil makes waves in Huckabee's presidential run

Comment #111987 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 6:36 am

19. Comment #111986 by Jaffas85 -

So it's cigars all round then! No Bill, don't do that with it please, not again...

1364. The Group Delusion

Comment #111985 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 6:29 am

177. Comment #111981 by The Reverend Dark -

I was hoping for more liberal usage of the word 'fucktard' in your posting. I guess I'll have to remain disappointed...

1365. The Group Delusion

Comment #111977 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 6:14 am

173. Comment #111971 by The Reverend Dark -

Please, don't hold back. Tell us what you really think.

1366. Huckabee Wants A 'Faith-based' Constitution

Comment #111975 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 6:07 am

39. Comment #111963 by derekwilliams28 -

He's talking out of both sides of his mouth...
Even more impressively, he occasionally talks audibly whilst seated. Anatomically, how he does it, I just don't know.

1367. The Group Delusion

Comment #111944 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 3:40 am

167. Comment #111940 by Peacebeuponme -

Please note - clicking on wooter's name now returns 'User does not exist'. I wonder how difficult it will be to spot his next incarnation?

1368. The Group Delusion

Comment #111939 by irate_atheist on January 16, 2008 at 3:34 am

162. Comment #111934 by wooter -

Who made your god?

1370. 2 fleas for the Christmas week

Comment #111634 by irate_atheist on January 15, 2008 at 8:34 am

112. Comment #111633 by Philip1978 -

On this rare occasion, I'm going to disagree with you. I am of the opinion that they deserve to suffer and be miserable because of their adherence to, and promulgation of, ignorant superstitious beliefs. If they were happy, it is possible that more suckers could be conned into believing their brand of tripe. Regrettably, reason and decency cannot solve every problem in the world, sometimes you need an enema kit and a matchbox...

1371. The Group Delusion

Comment #111578 by irate_atheist on January 15, 2008 at 3:57 am

147. Comment #111577 by Philip1978 -

May I add a suggestion to drink more tea.

1372. The Group Delusion

Comment #111572 by irate_atheist on January 15, 2008 at 2:54 am

141. Comment #111560 by Incredulous -

To tell the truth I'm getting a little fed up of having my atheist mates patiently answer your questions with rational and sane responses...
It's why I don't bother myself by responding particularly politely to this self-confessed ignoramus.

1373. The Group Delusion

Comment #111554 by irate_atheist on January 15, 2008 at 2:06 am

134. Comment #111544 by wooter -

Ooh!!!!!! As if I care...

1374. The Group Delusion

Comment #111217 by irate_atheist on January 14, 2008 at 3:57 am

110. Comment #111214 by epeeist -

If you tell us what your native language is then we can provide you explanatory information or answers in that language.
Is anyone else here thinking 'Double Dutch'?

1375. The Group Delusion

Comment #111212 by irate_atheist on January 14, 2008 at 3:47 am

107. Comment #111210 by wooter-

Mr RD, your guys call you like that but in terms of being respectful, I will call you Mr Dawkins.
If you actually want to be respectful wooter, which for some reason or other I doubt, how about using his full title and qualifications:

Prof. Richard Dawkins MA, D.Sc. (Oxon), FRS, FRSL,
Hon. D.Litt. (Saint Andrews), Hon. D.Litt. (Australian
National University, Canberra), Hon. D.Sc. (Westminster),
Hon. D.Sc. (Hull), Hon D.Univ. (Open University),
Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science,
University of Oxford, and Professorial Fellow of New College

1376. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110441 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 7:08 am

483. Comment #110436 by Roger Stanyard -

I'll get my stick out to you even though I've got my MA.

And for the record, are we to understand that you are actually referring to the subset of original thoughts that are actually valid when tested empirically and peer-reviewed?

1377. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110432 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 6:40 am

476. Comment #110426 by Steve Zara -

It's the old adage, never assume anything. It makes an ass out of you and me.

1378. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110423 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 6:13 am

463. Comment #110412 by ADH -

This is pure speculation. You have no idea what is going on inside the brain of the said chimp.
Nor have you - directly. However, studies have been done on this sort of behaviour and the results are very human-like.

And yet you would claim that any 'moral' behaviour by the beast could only be as a result of magical programming by an eternal rule-maker? It's not like they've been studying the Sermon on the Mount, old chap. They don't even seem to have a wealth of ancient stone tablets to rely upon for guidance in such matters.

1379. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110407 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 5:55 am

456. Comment #110402 by ADH on January 11, -

So, er, before your trinitarian man-god appeared, people simply would not have know how to behave properly? Anywhere? Anytime?

What proof do you have to support your wanton assertions vis a vis naturalism's inability to result in 'moral' behaviour?

1380. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110388 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 5:03 am

446. Comment #110381 by ADH -

However, there is an exception if your brother dies without having had a son. In that case, a man is obligated to impregnate his widowed sister-in-law to give his dead brother a son, who becomes the brother's heir. Deuteronomy 25:5-10 describes a way for the brother to decline this responsibility, but presumably at the time of the story of Onan, that legal mechanism wasn't known. - ADH
...The question is: what exactly does this mean? Religious leaders have advanced different interpretations over the centuries, mostly to justify societal mores.

It's often difficult to establishing what sex practices various writers meant because they used euphemisms--there wasn't a technical sexual vocabulary until fairly recently. Also, the authors of commentaries didn't want to give readers ideas by being too explicit--the "above all, don't put beans in your ear!" syndrome.

The earliest interpretations were straightforward... -ADH

As ever, we come to the only logical and reasonable conlusion based on the evidence placed before us:
Thus the mildest criticism of religion is also the most radical and the most devastating one. Religion is man-made. Even the men who made it cannot agree on what their prophets or redeemers or gurus actually said or did. Still less can they hope to tell us the "meaning" of later discoveries and developments which were, when they began, either obstructed by their religions or denounced by them. And yet—the believers still claim to know! - Christopher Hitchens

1381. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #110378 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 4:33 am

432. Comment #110361 by epeeist -

For those that want more of the same:

ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/r/rabelais/francois/r11g/part79.html

1382. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110369 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 4:03 am

440. Comment #110366 by Philip1978 -

Or to directly amend the original with the minimum of hassle, simply remove the word 'not'.

1383. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #110365 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 3:54 am

A pertinant question for this thread-

Could there be a Darwinian Account of Wooter's Inanity?


Answers on a postcard, please, to the usual address. Best theory submitted wins an no-expenses paid trip to the Creation Museum (http://www.creationmuseum.org). The judges decision is final, the winner will be notified by ESP. This competition is not open to trolls, fleas or revcort.

1384. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110359 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 3:44 am

437. Comment #110356 by Tyler Durden -

If it's so obvious, you should have no problems supplying pertinent references, thanks.
Ah, but, you see, because it's so obvious, there aren't any...a bit like why it's so obvious there's a god and he's good.

1385. Six Reasons to be an Atheist

Comment #110355 by irate_atheist on January 11, 2008 at 3:28 am

422. Comment #110332 by ADH -

Roger, you will notice that I said "A HABIT OF MASTURBATION"
Are you referring to nuns?

1386. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #109930 by irate_atheist on January 10, 2008 at 4:39 am

412. Comment #109929 by Quetzalcoatl -

Indeed, and I'm very pleased with how they turned out.
I'll raise my mug to that.

1387. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #109923 by irate_atheist on January 10, 2008 at 4:14 am

404. Comment #109916 by Diacanu -

Heretic! It was the great Quetz himself (blessed be his teapot) who twirled those mitochondria.

1388. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #109901 by irate_atheist on January 10, 2008 at 2:41 am

390. Comment #109891 by wooter

You forgot the coconut. So well packaged for our mammalian use. Try opening one with your teeth.

You forgot mushrooms and other fungi. How delectable are Amanita muscaria and Amanita phalloides. Yum yum.

1389. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #109622 by irate_atheist on January 9, 2008 at 9:30 am

381. Comment #109617 by al-rawandi -

Hold your own chorizo - leave mine alone.

1390. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #109547 by irate_atheist on January 9, 2008 at 7:05 am

354. Comment #109510 by wooter -

Ah, yes, the twisted brain-wrong of a one-off man-mental.

1391. Hook, line and rapture

Comment #109470 by irate_atheist on January 9, 2008 at 5:34 am

39. Comment #109467 by coretemprising -

Splitter!

1392. Hook, line and rapture

Comment #109129 by irate_atheist on January 8, 2008 at 12:09 pm

"A primitive death cult masquerading as a religion".


What a classic.

1394. Sadly, an Honest Creationist

Comment #106528 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 4:53 am

16. Comment #106527 by PlagioClase -

So what made your God?

1395. Could there be a Darwinian Account of Human Creativity?

Comment #106516 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 4:25 am

170. Comment #106502 by wooter

1. The ones with swearing like Irates atheist who was asking me to give answer. The bad words belong to the mouth it pops out. Thank God, I did not use any bad word or swearing ones since I started writing on this web page. Insulting comes from weaknesses or being desperate.
Oooh!!!!! Ever so humbled I am!!!!!

1396. The OUT Campaign has its own Flea!

Comment #106486 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 3:13 am

53. Comment #106482 by Geoff -

You're fucking nicked me old beauty!

1397. The religiosity test: Doubters need not apply

Comment #106484 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 3:07 am

21. Comment #106474 by Tyler Durden -

True, true. But mayhap he's smart enough to not believe his own propaganda? We can but hope, more in faith than certainty.

1398. The religiosity test: Doubters need not apply

Comment #106471 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 2:13 am

19. Comment #106469 by Tyler Durden -

Hmm...Obama seems at least sane (in comparison?).

1399. The religiosity test: Doubters need not apply

Comment #106467 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 2:04 am

Great. The most powerful nation on earth, quite possible about to be governed by another complete nob-jockey. Beyond tears.

1400. The Pagan Christ

Comment #106466 by irate_atheist on January 3, 2008 at 2:03 am

210. Comment #106433 by albondigas -

Not even wrong.