Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by mejdrich


101. A new website addition: Debate Points

Comment #81546 by mejdrich on October 24, 2007 at 10:28 pm

Just commenting to say:

what a great idea. Thank you again, professor Dawkins.

102. Debate between Michael Shermer and Dinesh D'Souza

Comment #80457 by mejdrich on October 21, 2007 at 10:30 pm

Right on, Diacanu. This was a disgrace. Atheists from YouTube would have done better. *sigh*

103. Debate between Michael Shermer and Dinesh D'Souza

Comment #80456 by mejdrich on October 21, 2007 at 10:26 pm

AHHHH! The longer I listen, the madder I get! Hilter wasn't a Christian!? And he lets him get away with it! He's picking his eye while Darwin is practically called a Nazi!

104. Debate between Michael Shermer and Dinesh D'Souza

Comment #80452 by mejdrich on October 21, 2007 at 10:14 pm

Grr! It's so frustrating! When he's asked questions, he doesn't answer. When he's supposed to be asking questions... he goes on a 5 min monologue before getting around to a question! Where is Hitchens when you need him!?

105. Debate between Michael Shermer and Dinesh D'Souza

Comment #80450 by mejdrich on October 21, 2007 at 10:05 pm

I'm sorry, listening to this guy repeatedly claim Christianity as the source of all morality ... and not getting called out on the complete absurdity of that arrogant claim ... is really really pissing me off.

Atheists need to stop being so F'ing polite or we'll never get out from under these guys.

106. Debate between Christopher Hitchens and Alister McGrath

Comment #79310 by mejdrich on October 16, 2007 at 9:30 pm

I hope it's not heresy to say, but I'm starting to think Hitchens is a better debater than Dawkins.

This was magnificent.

I feel like I just finished watching a football game, and my home team just won.

Hitchens makes McGrath positively look like the swiveling hack of an apologetic that he is.

107. Debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox

Comment #76495 by mejdrich on October 6, 2007 at 2:08 am

>This was not a debate - it was an ambush.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks this. Lennox was so anxious to attack Richard that he even did it during, what was supposed to be, his 'autobiographical' segment. Disgraceful.

And if Dawkins had played by the rules, the only opportunity he would have had to rebut 2 hours of shameless trolling would have been a few minutes at the very end. "Christian charity" indeed. :(