101. Richard Dawkins interviews Derren Brown
Comment #300380 by the great teapot on December 11, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Camera work reminds me of s"h"aving Ryans privates,
oops sorry can't believe I said that. I,of course,mean Debbie does Dallas.
Nearly embarrassed myself there, just spotted it in time.
102. Richard Dawkins interviews Father George Coyne
Comment #300162 by the great teapot on December 11, 2008 at 5:18 am
Wow, the Catholic church has a priest for everyone.
He seems to have stripped catholicism down bare to the nicene creed.
Any further and you lose your mealticket.
Many a catholic will be reassured to know that you can be well versed in science,not believe in the supernatural and still believe in god. He will be of great comfort to them.
103. Here Be Dragons - The Movie
Comment #298686 by the great teapot on December 8, 2008 at 12:10 pm
Buddhist wisdom
Oxymoron?
Lights touch paper and exits.
104. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God
Comment #298378 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 12:38 pm
I still expect an apology.
105. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God
Comment #298376 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 12:26 pm
ignore me why don't ye.
106. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298359 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 11:29 am
jabber,
Sounds fantastic.
I am a believer.
More tea Jeeves.
107. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298350 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 10:50 am
Alan,
I thought they may have moved on,
thanks to great English patriots like Ian Wright etc, clearly I expected too much.
108. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298345 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 10:39 am
Saerain, Roger and Baron
Thanks.
What a bunch of ******.
My apologies chaps, you are quite correct in your views.
109. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298339 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 10:22 am
Give us a U
Give us a K
Baron
That is not a BNP website, it is an anti BNP website.
Don't get me wrong I am well aware of what they are assumed to represent. But what do they actually say.
Can the teachers unions justify their prejudice?
Does the BNP consider a black briton inferior to a white briton?
I also would like to add I am in no way a supporter.
110. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298333 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 10:11 am
Baron
I had no idea our police force was so bigoted.
Does the BNP advocate racism?
111. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298329 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 9:52 am
Is being a member of BNP a crime?
(Other than a crime against decency)
112. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God
Comment #298327 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 9:42 am
Mphil
All i did was ask questions.
Why did you answer as if I had made a false statement.
I've read sophies world and listened to melvyn Bragg so there isn't much you can tell me about philophosy:)
113. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298267 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 6:25 am
Dhamma
Why did the McCan girl become international news?
The story was followed in the lowlands as well.
114. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298246 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 5:50 am
MRA
You are pushing an open door.
115. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God
Comment #298240 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 5:35 am
Dianelos.
Why does a belief in a particular god "make more sense" This is merely speculation and has no rational explanation. I understand that there is a possibility nothing can be proven but why can you randomly assert that one pile of bullshit is better than another.
116. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298226 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 5:08 am
MRA
Cheap advertising.
In answer to the question that is no more.
117. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298220 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 4:52 am
Apeseed
Well said. "All we are doing is telling strangers how to live their lives and for some reason they don't like it.Well, how rude can you be."
118. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298211 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 4:32 am
Roger
Like you, I think, I was immediately struck by how he perceives indifference as intolerance.
Outside of this website all one sees in the uk is religous indifference. Perhaps he secretly lurks here.
119. Britain is 'unfriendly' for religious people
Comment #298210 by the great teapot on December 7, 2008 at 4:26 am
Mendacious seems a bit harsh.
120. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298080 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:49 pm
Roger
The church knew it had to move or look damned stupid, also many people claiming to believe did not. They were more than likely just playing along.
All of which is besides the point, not everything has to be spoken as if we are preparing for the final reckoning.You are clearly in education. Loosen up.
Isn't Banal point scoring enough.
121. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298076 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:43 pm
So shrug what.
122. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298074 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:34 pm
Let me think now, oh yes they would have been the ones barred from political life.
123. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298073 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Slavery was abolished by christian politicians.
Where were the atheist politicians?
124. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298070 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:29 pm
and social suicide
125. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298069 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Believers made great contributions to science.
Especially when being a non believer was professional suicide.
126. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298067 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Roger - You don't say.
Fuck me you know practically everything.
127. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298064 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Why Mr Darcy, I do believe you overstate the size of the churches contribution.
(blushes profusely)
128. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again
Comment #298062 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 3:52 pm
the house of lords is a fine institution, it just looks dumb.
(sorry, stupid, must be more PC)
129. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again
Comment #298061 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 3:50 pm
Perhaps it is the first time he has visited a gay dating website.
In response to 1602
130. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again
Comment #298052 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 3:20 pm
Moral dilema
No worries, just refer to our source of absolute morals, prob solved.
Now, where did I put them.
131. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again
Comment #298048 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Words of consolation are failing me:)
But I have inherited a small fortune which I can release with a small downpayment of $20,000. Unfortunately I do not have the resources at the moment but if any of your faculty can advance me this small sum they will be amply rewarded.
132. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again
Comment #298046 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Hellene
It sounds like the rest of the faculty are eating in the pond.
Where do you teach? Hogwarts?
133. The Axis of Evo
Comment #298044 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 2:46 pm
43 Vergil
Most believers I know....
Perhaps not, but I bet the white ones all think god is white and speaks english.
sorry Merican.
134. What's Old Is New: 12 Living Fossils
Comment #298034 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Looks tasty,
I wonder how fast it hops.
135. Inner Workings Of The Immune System Filmed
Comment #298013 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Steve
Newtons laws of motion aren't reality.
Fifi force= Arty accelaration x Mickey mass,
Is that any better.
136. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God
Comment #297989 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Not "why aren't you a Buddhist"
But how can you believe in anything at all in preference to anything else.
Which is exactly where he wants to be, as "only if all is permitted can god exist"
Religion is the ultimate nihilism.
137. Children of God?
Comment #297985 by the great teapot on December 6, 2008 at 11:57 am
haven't read anything before my post.
But the answer is- offcourse they fucking aren't.
Without the influence of parents and locoparenti as my school day out forms put it, children would be still wallowing in their own shit.
"End of" as Melvyn Bragg never said.
Hard wired my arse...
Comment #296459 by the great teapot on December 3, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Next time steve I recommend a cheaper cake, it leaves more money for colour photographs.
Thanks for sharing the moment.
Good luck lads.
139. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again
Comment #296451 by the great teapot on December 3, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Al.
Unfortunately in the UK losing is very fashionable.Our cyclist are a little behind the times, but I am sure by 2012 we will have them towing the party line.
Comment #296439 by the great teapot on December 3, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Goldy
True, true
If it made sense it wouldn't require faith.
silly me.
Comment #296426 by the great teapot on December 3, 2008 at 2:27 pm
A bit out off topic , maybe.
But a thought occured to me today- why on earth could the "son of god", in a world that already had several written languages, not even spell his own name?
And how come in a world where next to no one else could write did we end up with speeches from him being recorded in a foreign land several decades after his death.And yet nothing was recorded at the time. Just a thought.WTF?
The only explanation I can think of is he never existed at all.
So, god could write on a stone tablet for moses.
But Jesus couldn't even spell his own name.
142. Richard Dawkins and Aubrey Manning
Comment #296415 by the great teapot on December 3, 2008 at 2:13 pm
retropsy
In 1692 they would have said the line was crossed in 1674.
143. Richard Dawkins and Aubrey Manning
Comment #296354 by the great teapot on December 3, 2008 at 1:23 pm
"ofcourse not consciously."
How he know?
we must keep ourselves above the dirty buggers.
144. Children of God?
Comment #293735 by the great teapot on November 30, 2008 at 1:41 am
Mmurray
How did you describe god to him, not as though you believed in it yourself, I bet.
If you had acted as though you believed I suspect he would have responded differently.
145. Religion's Misguided Missiles
Comment #286428 by the great teapot on November 18, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Viva la quince brigade.
146. Religion's Misguided Missiles
Comment #286236 by the great teapot on November 18, 2008 at 11:28 am
Jdbriggs
I prefer not to kill or cause pain because I don't like to see other people (or other animals) suffer.
The fact that a book says we are made in gods image seems a rather abstract, head in the clouds way of looking at things.Are you hoping to be rewarded for this love of god approach?
147. Catholic bishops warn Obama they'll fight on abortion: Statement to focus on 'opposing evil'
Comment #285734 by the great teapot on November 17, 2008 at 2:05 pm
I am with you Mphil.
All be it a little late.
Let's eat the bastards.
Ye ha.
148. SC priest: No communion for Obama supporters
Comment #284648 by the great teapot on November 15, 2008 at 2:40 pm
at comment 23
Their faults do not justify yours.
149. SC priest: No communion for Obama supporters
Comment #284623 by the great teapot on November 15, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Katana
I would guess "thou shall't not kill"
would be a good one.
No tzsak it counts before and after you are born.
(but there are no absolutes, so if you are bigger than me I agree- for now)
150. Hitchens Debates Rabbi Wolpe on God
Comment #284615 by the great teapot on November 15, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Not my god, my god is a loving god.
(Well he loves beer)