










101. Norway flourishes as secular nation
Comment #76105 by tieInterceptor on October 4, 2007 at 6:11 pm
I can't believe some of the comments,
A small beer for $9???
I'm sure Norway is a beautiful country and I'd love to visit, but I think I'll pass giving up my US citizenship and moving there.
102. Logical Path from Religious Beliefs to Evil Deeds
Comment #75361 by tieInterceptor on October 2, 2007 at 11:56 am
Matt7895 on October 2, 2007 at 8:36 am
"Polls suggest that 13% of British Muslims regard the 7/7 London bombers as blessed martyrs."
103. The Saudi connection that belittles Britain
Comment #73467 by tieInterceptor on September 25, 2007 at 3:39 am
I was very upset about the police move on 'dispatches' undercover mosque.
that docu had long uninterrupted speeches , In no way it was edited to sound worst that it was.
by the way,
Have you guys seen the president of Iran, Ahmadinejad pulling an Al-taquiyya move? He is asked about gay executions, and he starts rambling about drug trafficking, then he is asked again, he is cornered "why we execute homosexuals in Iran?"
the he answers.....
wait ... I wont spoil it, watch it yourselves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xou92apNN4o
... lost for words.
104. Why are we Muslims so self-destructive?
Comment #73321 by tieInterceptor on September 24, 2007 at 5:44 pm
if anyone feels in danger then naturally they should protect themselves. It's a personal thing, is what I'm saying.
105. A problem for Israel's farmers: The seven-year hitch
Comment #73252 by tieInterceptor on September 24, 2007 at 3:01 pm
growing vegetables 120 cm floating above the ground on imported earth? are they kidding me,
it's like the vampire filling their coffins full of Transylvanian earth to rest at night,
reality is way funnier than fiction.
106. Why are we Muslims so self-destructive?
Comment #73177 by tieInterceptor on September 24, 2007 at 11:09 am
nice article,
I think she overplays the golden years of Islam, more like the golden years of Kalifates with educated rulers who where powerful enough to not take Islam that seriously and promoted science in their courts. Then in time science became out of favour with the rulers, mostly due to the revered scholar Al-Ghazali, and religious literalism took over.
As we all know, if you read the Quran literally, then you get the answer to the article.
criticism is out of the question... and violent response demanded. That's enough to bring down any society.
related to this.
Science and the Koran: The Decline of Islamic Science.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcSXwPsgLhE
then again I'm not an expert
107. Critical Analysis of Case for a Creator
Comment #72505 by tieInterceptor on September 21, 2007 at 10:23 am
Have fun learning!
108. Critical Analysis of Case for a Creator
Comment #72277 by tieInterceptor on September 20, 2007 at 4:06 pm
amazing videos, I loved it
favourites material oooh yes.
109. Larry King Interviews Kathy Griffin
Comment #71541 by tieInterceptor on September 19, 2007 at 2:06 am
I think she was great,
she is a comedian so she has a bigger leeway to say things and people are expected to take them with a pinch of salt and some sense of fun.
And the fact that they are bringing attention to all the censoring and the newspaper rable rable makes the theist look like a bunch of fascist prima donnas.
.
110. In Depth: Christopher Hitchens
Comment #71537 by tieInterceptor on September 19, 2007 at 1:53 am
.
If anyone prefers the youtube version for any reason at all, I have made a playlist with all of them.
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=820E0F76DC8D628B
111. Religious education
Comment #71303 by tieInterceptor on September 18, 2007 at 10:38 am
from those links of the Standards site, makes me really worried,
Objectives
Children should learn:
* about the argument from design
* to think of their own illustration for the argument from design
* to reflect on their own experience of creation
Outcomes
Children:
* write about the main arguments to prove God's existence from the design of the world
* exemplify the argument for themselves
* read biblical text with understanding
112. Good News: Both our Foundations are now Officially Recognized as Charities
Comment #70429 by tieInterceptor on September 15, 2007 at 12:37 pm
Great news! this is one of the few charities that I think matter and can make a difference.
I will be donating for sure.
113. Open letter to YouTube video
Comment #70369 by tieInterceptor on September 15, 2007 at 5:30 am
couldn't believe they banned RichardDawkins.net, and now this,
Comment #70246 by tieInterceptor on September 14, 2007 at 2:02 pm
I agree Northern Bright that he does a good job of shooting himself on the foot with that review, but I still would prefer 'the Independent' to put someone to the job that does not have such a history
If I read a movie review, I would like to know that the reviewer does not work at the cinema.
what annoys me is that unless people goggle for the name, they would not known that he is definitely not an objective reviewer.
.
Comment #70229 by tieInterceptor on September 14, 2007 at 12:24 pm
I wondered why a reviewer from The Independent would say "and the sheer factual inaccuracy of Christopher Hitchens's rant" so I googled the name,
wikipedia comes up with this,
Peter Stanford~ is a British writer, editor, journalist, and presenter. He writes for The Guardian, The Sunday Times, and The Independent on Sunday. He was editor of The Catholic Herald , and a regular contributor to the New Statesman. He has written many books, mainly biographies and books about religion.
?
WHAT where they thinking???
what's next? monkeys reviewing bananas?
.
116. Review of Richard Dawkins' new book 'The Fascism Delusion'
Comment #69219 by tieInterceptor on September 10, 2007 at 3:26 am
"
This piece does not rely on comparing religion and facism. What it does is taking the arguments against the attack on facism is the same as the arguments against the attack on religion. And since the arguments works and we still know fascism is bad, we have an absurd situation. And this shows that arguments themselves are flawed.
So this writing does NOT rely on comparing fascism with religion.
117. Bible Belter
Comment #68202 by tieInterceptor on September 6, 2007 at 10:35 am
lol, some of the comments under the article are waky,
There is a tie breaker: The Book of Mormon. Maligned in this essay, it actually is complex, profound, and, most importantly... literally true.
Dawkins (and Hitchens) incorrectly state that only Smith saw the plates. At least a dozen others gave sober accounts of the plates, and most of those statements are published in the book itself. They had no ulterior motive, and much incentive not to lie. Even after some of them fell out with Smith, they refused offers by critics to "expose" him. Why?
The concern with the plates is for a tangible artifact that demonstrates God's reality, but we do have that: The Book of Mormon text itself, and the mountain of evidence for its veracity.
For a full, intelligent survey of the facts, see www.MormonEvidence.com.
Jamie Huston, North Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
the founding book of a religion is the literal truth of god?
who figured!
.
Comment #67954 by tieInterceptor on September 5, 2007 at 11:12 am
wasn't the voyager satellite blow up by the Klingon in Star Trek V?
119. Christopher Hitchens on BookTV
Comment #67949 by tieInterceptor on September 5, 2007 at 10:31 am
very interesting talk by 'the one and only' mr Hitchens.
his thoughts on abortion did make me think he is against it 100%, but as okmichigan mentions, most likely he did not mean that a 3 day old embryo is a baby, but that there is a moment that a unborn child is developed enough to be considered alive. therefore there is a time deadline in the development of the foetus that should not be crossed.
I made a playlist with the entire youtube videos 1 to 19
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=820E0F76DC8D628B
so they are easy to find to anyone interested.
120. 'Root of All Evil? The Uncut Interviews' Released on DVD
Comment #67876 by tieInterceptor on September 5, 2007 at 3:57 am
yeah, can you elaborate as much as you are allowed as why the full interview with Mr Haggard is off limits?
I'm really curious,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBC5L6cyq2Y
I still laugh at this farce in utube
121. There is no God and Dawkins is his Prophet
Comment #66507 by tieInterceptor on August 30, 2007 at 6:47 am
Henri Bergson:
Sweden is destroying itself at the moment by 'accepting' all cultures & religions.
Sweden's 3rd city, Malmö, has been predicted to be the first European city with a muslim majority.
122. Scientists should unite against threat from religion
Comment #65214 by tieInterceptor on August 23, 2007 at 7:49 am
I thought coruscating was the planet that it's the centre of the republic.
:)
123. Scientists should unite against threat from religion
Comment #64998 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 3:21 pm
one, thing is certain,
Bizarro sure knows how to steer away a conversation...
I thought the topic was the funny Muslims and their 7th century book, that if you pull half cooked translations and squint your eyes, you could find passages that say something vaguely related to any current scientific knowledge.
and it is always current science, funny how they did not know about the big bang before, the info was there for the last 1428 years for everyone to see... how did they miss it until now?
124. Scientists should unite against threat from religion
Comment #64949 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 1:19 pm
"roach: Chastity is the second most overrated virtue right after faith."
and dangerous, sometimes does motivate a few sex starved people to blow themselves up to get a-lot-a-vagina in the after life.
Bizarro Dawkins wrote: I'm a 20 year old guy, and I've had more than a few opportunities to let my hormones do the thinking. Thankfully, humans are not animals. We can choose to repress our instincts. I'm still a virgin. Sure, it hasn't been easy, but I've chosen to wait until I am married. And trust me, if a 20 year old male can do it, anyone can do it ;-).
just in case he edits ;)
125. Scientists should unite against threat from religion
Comment #64942 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 12:59 pm
BycicleRepiairMan, they use both check it out
http://www.quranm.multicom.ba/science/5e-mlivo.htm
http://www.quranm.multicom.ba/science/2e-quran.htm
and Bizarro, abstinence only? nice one... that doesn't even work for priests, get out.
it's like preaching water abstinence to fight dysentery... 100% effective too.
.
126. Scientists should unite against threat from religion
Comment #64926 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 12:06 pm
Go Harris go!
we need to stand our ground... I've seen many of the 'miracle in the Quran' youtube videos that I understand Sam's point perfectly,
They take the Quran and after selective interpretation + poetic reading and carefully selected 'translations' state that it has prior knowledge of the big bang, atomic theory and all the science that we know more or less...
It's infuriating, not only it is insulting to the men and women that really did this amazing scientific discovery ... Is that you run into so many bigots in the internet that repeat this claims as the undeniable proof of the Quran... again and again and again.
example, three translations of the same passage that apparently shows prior knowledge of the big bang.
Quran, (51:47)
And We have spread out the (spacious) earth: How excellently We do spread out!
translated by YUSUFALI
And the earth have We laid out, how gracious is the Spreader (thereof)!
translated by PICKTHAL
And the earth, We have made it a wide extent; how well have We then spread (it) out.
translated by SHAKIR
if you look for Quran 51:47 the first link in google goes to a "Quran And Science" web page, and this is how they translated it.
And the firmament (sky) We constructed with power and skill and verily We are expanding it."
(Qur'an, 51:47)
less, spreading... (flat earth) and more expanding, like expanding universe ...
and this is the Miraculous 7th century revelation of the big bang.
Awesome stuff,
if you are 5 years old.
127. Rational Atheism
Comment #64842 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 3:46 am
as Hitchens points out again and again, 'reverend' gives credence to anyone who puts in in front of its name,
much as doctor use to be, until science got devalued on the eyes of the masses mainly by the faithful efforts.
we Must use every chance we get to ask serious questions to those who claim to know what they obviously do not know.
most people will believe the reverends and 'experts' of theology if no one treats them with the disdain they rightfully deserve.
once those charlatans are ridiculed enough, people will think twice about following them, no one wants to follow an idiot, but lots do thanks to the aura of respectavility,
128. Poll: Which religion do you associate with?
Comment #64839 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 3:35 am
I voted,
"every little helps"
..... 'Tesco' 2007
129. Ancient Protein Tells a Story of Changing Functions
Comment #64827 by tieInterceptor on August 22, 2007 at 2:14 am
so if I start a bold statement and do not close it it boldifies everyone after me,
cool :D
well, good to know
does anyone remember the name of that article I was talking about , with the fishes and the ponds and the plane anecdote ? any takers :(
130. Ancient Protein Tells a Story of Changing Functions
Comment #64756 by tieInterceptor on August 21, 2007 at 4:37 pm
yeah, I think it was here as one of the articles on the front page.
I remember having comments on it, and I can't find it on the forums... since I can filter for things I talked one.
so it must be one of the front page one... but there is so many.
,
131. A Matter of Faith
Comment #64724 by tieInterceptor on August 21, 2007 at 1:19 pm
"ohaioAtheist: Better than having a Hedges-style mysterian who uses many words to say nothing at all and thereby ends up looking far more insightful than he is."
true, It really makes my blood boil when they pull the smokescreen effect, so at least he admitted there is no proof, ... only faith,
132. Ancient Protein Tells a Story of Changing Functions
Comment #64711 by tieInterceptor on August 21, 2007 at 12:27 pm
interesting stuff,
btw, can anyone point me to an article here we had a few weeks back about evolution tests done in fish, they where on natural water spring , and the scientist separated some fish into springs with no predators, and others with... ones over some 4 years I think, became colourful to win on sexual selection, the others under predatory pressure became dull to win on camouflage driven natural selection,
I really want to find it, excellent stuff to quote to the unbelievers ;)
the article ended with an anecdote, on the flight back from the springs, the researcher told what research he was doing to a passenger next to him, they guy loved it and asked what was the name of the research ... once he heard it was evolution, he said I do not believe in that, and turn around...
anyone remember the article?
133. Sikh girl will convert for a place at Catholic school
Comment #64509 by tieInterceptor on August 20, 2007 at 10:18 am
there is an episode of 'Malcolm in the Middle' called 'daycare' where the family pretends to be catholic and sends the kids to bible class to get free daycare for their baby.
Reese gets brainwashed and flies away on a chair strapped with helium balloons to meet god.
great episode,
life imitates art.
134. Bill Maher Making New Documentary Movie, 'Religulous'
Comment #64419 by tieInterceptor on August 20, 2007 at 3:21 am
eggplant why did you find it crap? I could not find any problem with it at all.
any particular insight you want to share?
135. God Bless Me, It's a Best-Seller!
Comment #64108 by tieInterceptor on August 17, 2007 at 6:47 pm
Hitchens knows how to entertain and convey the message so well,
we can really count ourselves lucky to have brains like Dawkins, Harris and Hitchens on our side, I almost feel sorry for the opposition :)
136. Hitchens, Dawkins, Harris: The Unholy Trinity ... Thank God.
Comment #63641 by tieInterceptor on August 15, 2007 at 7:24 am
plenty of nasty comments on the original article about Hitchens,
fair enough he supports the iraq war, but they go from there to make him a friend of the devil... what nonsense.
137. Public Debate on Complexity and Evolution
Comment #63469 by tieInterceptor on August 14, 2007 at 12:37 pm
I was happy to hear someone asking the 'number of child's question'
It's something that worries me, to be out breed by the superstitious and religious people.
138. These preachers of hate must be exposed
Comment #63385 by tieInterceptor on August 14, 2007 at 3:59 am
excellent article, I really want to see this nonsensical claim by the CPS that 'it was out of context' followed until the end.
If that is the case prove it, if not retract publicly and clearly, and then do something serious about the hate mongers on those mosques.
139. Interview with Richard Dawkins about 'The Enemies of Reason'
Comment #63071 by tieInterceptor on August 13, 2007 at 4:17 am
so, Is it tonight at channel 4?
140. When did the police start collaring television?
Comment #62968 by tieInterceptor on August 12, 2007 at 4:09 pm
thank goodness that someone agrees with me, the police needs to answer about this, its an outrage!
that program was nothing but state of the art undercover journalism, how do they dare defend the crazies!? an outrage!
141. Another Flea is Born
Comment #62520 by tieInterceptor on August 10, 2007 at 3:10 am
that church sign generator is comedy gold
142. Atheist 'Metaphysics' and Religious Equivocation
Comment #62144 by tieInterceptor on August 8, 2007 at 10:22 am
Hey guys click on the link and DIGG it, lets see if it goes to first page ;)
http://digg.com/general_sciences/Atheist_Metaphysics_and_Religious_Equivocation
143. A Designer Universe?
Comment #61333 by tieInterceptor on August 4, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Very nice article, he lost me a bit with atomic theory in the middle, but that's my fault not his ;)
and I agree, the ending is great.
144. Islamic creationist group launches glitzy, global blitz
Comment #61083 by tieInterceptor on August 3, 2007 at 2:35 pm
that could help us, if the Radical Muslims promote Intelligent design, this is going to ring some bells to a few people.
like when your parent like a rock band, automatically stops being cool ;)
145. In Games, an Insight Into the Rules of Evolution
Comment #61079 by tieInterceptor on August 3, 2007 at 2:26 pm
A successful scientist uses Occam's razor to do its work.
But if they are indoctrinated when young they can be tempted to add an extra line at the end of the paper that goes something like this. ( But invisible man could have helped the odds to make it look like it does)
Not surprisingly they only dismiss the Razor at the very end, once the work is done. Almost like an after thought,
if they didn't the lack of razor would make it impossible to withstand any peer review.
Sad,
146. Could these books be part of the problem?
Comment #60862 by tieInterceptor on August 3, 2007 at 2:53 am
"Maybe you're missing the point of the thread? The two books shown above are real."
the onion an reality are not that far appart ...
thanks for the heads up, I was puzzled, if it was real, is funny in a sad for humanity kinda way, if it was photoshop, then it was a poor joke by an atheist...
so, we win! yay
147. They let anybody onto the faculty at Oxford nowadays
Comment #60851 by tieInterceptor on August 3, 2007 at 2:25 am
gcdavis ... I wish I had your abatar!
Comment #60701 by tieInterceptor on August 2, 2007 at 5:52 pm
scientists are so arrogant with their evidence based opinions, so cold.
I always preferred to vote for people that look nice and have a sincere smile, gut feeling opinions are the way to go.
;)
149. They let anybody onto the faculty at Oxford nowadays
Comment #60697 by tieInterceptor on August 2, 2007 at 5:43 pm
I would dare anyone to read or 'look closely' at the Nicene Creed and be convinced by it (or even understand it truly).
But the dare has one rule, it must be presented to someone that has never been indoctrinated or know about Christianity (much).
no one would buy it served cold like that, I bet anything.
I doubt that McGrath really studied the text and found the phrases and logic of it 'just fine' and went with it. For him it was the other way around, Accepted the religion first, then the Creed was just another bit of text that had to be digested as part of the Christian package that Alister ordered...
basically he is dishonest, or deluded, probably a bit of both.
Amazing article, so enjoyable to read clear thinking.
.
150. Man Regains Speech After Brain Stimulation
Comment #60608 by tieInterceptor on August 2, 2007 at 12:15 pm