Skip to Main Content (access key 1)
Skip to Search (access key 2)
Skip to Search GO (access key 3)
Skip to comments (access key 4)
Skip to navigation (access key 5)
Skip to top of page (access key 6)

Comments by Diacanu


1701. Are the 'New Atheists' avoiding the 'real arguments'?

Comment #131647 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 9:28 pm

We've kicked the "historical evidence", point down several times, but he just doesn't want to acknowledge it.

How the hell do you tell people things they don't want to accept?

1702. Are the 'New Atheists' avoiding the 'real arguments'?

Comment #131643 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 8:49 pm

Shrommer-


It is only by His mercy that we are not all likewise consumed.


Passive aggression then, eh?

1703. Are the 'New Atheists' avoiding the 'real arguments'?

Comment #131638 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 8:37 pm

Shrommer-


God loves and accepts homosexuals and does not discriminate against anyone.


Except for the ones he burns, drowns with floods, besets with plagues, besets with plagues just to prove a point to the devil, or turns into a pillar of salt just for looking the wrong way.

1704. Fleabytes

Comment #131626 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 6:52 pm

SRWB-

*Sigh* you're right.

Let the ugly little fascist hang himself with his own words.

I'll try to lighten up and laugh him off.

1705. Fleabytes

Comment #131623 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 6:18 pm

SRWB-


Now we all know that some of the regular posters on this site, myself included, can be quite heated and insulting, with any variation of expletives and insults being used in most original and constructive ways. Some have been downright rude, sometimes disgustingly so.


Well, at least none of us has ever said to another that if one of our loved ones lost a child, we wouldn't care, because we're all, including the baby, just disposable compost.

I find that more repulsive than a trillion fucks strung together, and repeatedly wrapped around the earth.

Hell, I find it more repulsive than scat porn.
I mean, that shit is vile, but at least in the end, it's consenting adults, no one dies, and they shower off after.

1706. Feb 12th: Happy Darwin Day!

Comment #131614 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 5:44 pm

wooter-


The big frog is asking big questions?
1.Why was not evolved? What is wrong with me?
2.Why was I the same as the living ones today?


We could explain it, but well, no nice way to say it, you really would be too stupid to understand.

You've had evolution explained til people were blue in the face, and you still keep going back to the same old creationist drivel as if no one said anything.

So, pick up your anti-education hump, and go piss off.
You're not here to learn, you're just a troll.

1707. Fleabytes

Comment #131568 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 3:23 pm

kaiserkriss-

Don't mean I can't at least throw in my two cents.
*Shrug*

1708. Fleabytes

Comment #131552 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 2:42 pm

Oh, and unlike some, I don't even have morbid rubbernecking curiosity about what DR has to say.

We all know it's going to be slippery bullshit at best, and disgustingly insulting at worst, and all wrapped in cartoonish martyrdom.

Listening to it would be like going through the motions in Groundhog Day.

And then from there, it's going to be the response the the review, the response to the response, the response to the response to the response, and DR gets to shovel more of his bullshit and bile, and the thread is just going to decay into a morass like i've seen a thousand times on other boards.

He doesn't deserve the attention, fuck him.

1710. Over half of Britons claim no religion

Comment #131537 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 2:08 pm

the great teapot-

Oh, you hadn't heard that?
Yeah, one of the things we've learned from chimps and gorillas that use sign language, is they love poo humor.
Seriously.

Poo, flatulence, toilets, they're like little kids.

1711. Over half of Britons claim no religion

Comment #131529 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:59 pm

the great teapot-

Um...scatological onomatopoeia is english.

I know they're big dictionary words, but you got Google at your fingertips....

1712. Over half of Britons claim no religion

Comment #131519 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:49 pm

Yeah, that's right, gas humor.
Humor so low, zoo monkeys love it.
I went there.
USA!! USA!! USA!!

1713. Fleabytes

Comment #131515 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:44 pm

al-rawandi-


No American guy goes to the bathroom with another guy.


You forgot Senator Craig!!

*Badump ching!!*

1714. Over half of Britons claim no religion

Comment #131513 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:42 pm

Steve Zara-

You forgot the scatological onomatopoeia!!

Here, lemme fix that for ya...


"Species level selection is a major force in evolution"

*BROOOMMPPT!!!*

Yeah! That felt good!

*BREEOOOMPPT!!*

Whoa, did you see the elephant run under my chair?

*SNAPPPT!!*

Ow!!!

1715. Fleabytes

Comment #131501 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:32 pm

Quetzalcoatl-

Di-A-Ca-Nu!!!!!!!!!


That move requires PTSD counseling afterward for both the victim and the perpetrator.
:(

1716. Over half of Britons claim no religion

Comment #131493 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Steve Zara-


if I said something dumb every now and then, I would be OK?


Yes, but it has to contain scatological onomatopoeia.
:D

1717. Fleabytes

Comment #131485 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:21 pm

Corylus's username when read inside my head sounds like one of the yells given out by the Street Fighter guys.

Y'know "ha do ken!!", "ha-oow doken!!", "Cory-ory-oolus!!!".

1718. Fleabytes

Comment #131453 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 12:56 pm

al-rawandi-

Ah.
Should've known.
Successful rackets leave no stone left unturned.

1719. Fleabytes

Comment #131440 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 12:45 pm

Well, christian apologists may be a bunch of slippery greased eels, but look at it this way.

As far as I know, islam has no apologetics.

They just threaten to kill you.
And do.

Christianity has to use weasel-ism, because secular society has put their barbarism in check.

So, don't let them give you an ulcer, have a giggle.

Hopefully, this is the future that awaits islam someday.
And given their apologetics will just be toddling it its baby walker, they'll be easy pickings, because we've heard all their bullshit before.

Hmm, and that makes me wonder, will they re-invent the wheel, or will hey just steal bullshit arguments from the christians?

Now there's a show that'll need the large bucket of popcorn.

1720. Fleabytes

Comment #131120 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 1:45 am

Irate_atheist-

So many gods to choose from, it's difficult to know where to start.


Ah, doesn't matter, so long as SOME funny-hat-wearing-shmuck somewhere is controlling your mind.

1721. Fleabytes

Comment #131102 by Diacanu on February 22, 2008 at 12:59 am

epeeist-


Those of us who have been on the site for a while know how manipulative he can be.


Indeed, it seems passive-aggression and manipulation are all the D'souza/McGrath/Robertson types have on offer.

Period.
For arguments, to offer humanity, that's it, manipulation.
That's IT.

There's no doubt left in me at all that ALL religion is is mind control.

That's it.

That's all it ever was.

Ever.

1722. Fleabytes

Comment #131079 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Thought it might be something like that.

1723. Fleabytes

Comment #131076 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 10:11 pm

Styrer-


but his opinion is absolutely of no importance whatsoever in either endorsing or gainsaying the import of my post.


Then whose is?

1724. Fleabytes

Comment #131065 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 9:19 pm

Styrer-


It is this notion - that you are placing your own rebuttals to Dawkins' detractors over his own possible responses to them - that leads to the idea that you are indicating that Dawkins' book was not good enough to stand alone in rebutting each and every one of Cornwell, McGrath, Robertson and Wilson's books' so-called 'arguments'.


Oh, that's just dumb.

This is Richard's site, and he has a posting account, and often uses it, if he objected to Paula's stuff he can speak up.

You taking offense in his stead is as presumptuous as you're accusing Paula of being.

1725. Fleabytes

Comment #130994 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 4:53 pm

Steve Zara-


He tries to push buttons to get responses (like comparing gay men to child molesters, or atheists to facist bullies), he attempts to emotionally manipulate people with claims that he is being attacked and censored.


Real Christlike, ain't he?

Oh, I guess slime, smarm, and weasel-ism are for the "greater good", or somesuch rationalization.

Once you swallow the invisible sky daddy, any logic leap is possible.

Almost never for the better I've noticed.

1726. Fleabytes

Comment #130992 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 4:49 pm

Clearthinker-


the bile and the continual ad hominem,


Yeah....

the baby had just died. Somehow elephants in fridges seem somewhat trivial. At least for those of us who believe that we are more than 'throwaway survival machines'.



Of course I know that my views are offensive to many people on this site - and I know that I express them in a robust way -


Yeah....

the baby had just died. Somehow elephants in fridges seem somewhat trivial. At least for those of us who believe that we are more than 'throwaway survival machines'.


Gosh, how christly.
I'm all a-twitter with the warm embrace of Jesusy goodnss.

1727. Fleabytes

Comment #130967 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 3:23 pm

Russel Blackford-

...not so much Kant as cant.


*Badump, ching!!*

:D

1728. Fleabytes

Comment #130890 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 12:58 pm

wice-


the point dawkins makes is that if you believe in such being, then you cannot use "the universe is so complex that it must have a creator" argument, because then you should explain why you don't use the same argument on your supposed creator,


And when you use that argument on the creator and the creator of the creator, etc, etc, that leads to infinite regression, which IS impossible.

1729. Fleabytes

Comment #130855 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 11:56 am

Artful_Dodger-

...that makes no ontological distinction between human beings and ... cauliflowers, or compost, or whatever.


Um...bullshit, read the post yet again, what part of it are you deliberately missing?

1730. Fleabytes

Comment #130837 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 11:32 am

krisking-


i wonder what drives her passion.


Oh, geez,how about knocking down bullshit and lies?
Is that not a laudable goal?
Or, is that another one of those things us soulless godless heathens aren't supposed to give a flip about?

1731. Fleabytes

Comment #130834 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 11:21 am

Artful_Dodger-

What I am saying is that if evolution is indeed indifferent, if it neither knows nor cares, then it is meaningless to expend our energies in defense of the weak and vulnerable. The "survival of the fittest" theme will always have the last word. Human dignity is of no more importance than the dignity of compost.


Hey, dummy, did you not read post 203?
And having read it, did it just bounce off your thick head??

Go back, and give it another run through.

1732. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130628 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 3:33 am

Oh, and as for Bishop/Wee Flea trolling to get some juicy quotes, well, isn't that exactly the sort of behavior Jesus would engage in?

Couldn't you just see him doing that?

Trolling message boards, pissing people off, and then quote mining them?

Well, y'know, first some water into wine, and then some healing of the sick, and then the fishes and loaves trick.

Then, after the drunken carousing from all the wine has settled down, some online shenanigans.

Y'know, go onto an atheist board, and be an utter condescending shit to people.

Can't you just see that?

Jesus the internet asshole?

Apparently his fanclub can see that, because they seem to think thats what he expects of his Jesus-kateers.

1733. Fleabytes

Comment #130627 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 3:23 am

Richard Morgan-

Maybe she means she's gone from the atheist position, to the anti-theist position.

Y'know, from just plain not believing in Gods, to being flat out grateful their aren't, given the sliminess of their fanclub members.

I personally find that feeling of gratitude and relief strengthening by the second when I suffer through a typical wooter post, or see a child evangelist video.

1734. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130623 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 2:59 am

wooter-

Well, I think Bishop assuming I haven't faced difficult things in my life, and thus insinuating either my life has been fluffy and meaningless, or that my grandmother's death was peachy, is pretty fucking shitty.

If your code of ethics tells you that's lovely behavior, then I want nothing to do with it.

1735. Fleabytes

Comment #130615 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 2:28 am

Steve Zara-


Or are we supposed to accept "I had a funny feeling" as evidence,


Dammit, Steve, "I had a funny feeling", IS evidence, because (insert 5 paragraphs of post-modernist drivel) so there!!

How dare you say my special feelings aren't evidence, you big meanie!!
That makes me sad, which is another special feeling, which proves atheists are all Stalin!
And my special feeling on the matter is proof, because of the post-modern drivel above!!

1737. Fleabytes

Comment #130588 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 12:53 am

Oh, and...

Artful_Dodger-


you write off many very serious objections to a priori materialsm with a few keystrokes in which you show that you have actually missed the point.


Do any of these objections to materialism have any evidence?

Or, just the usual theological double-talk?

1738. Fleabytes

Comment #130584 by Diacanu on February 21, 2008 at 12:45 am

Artful_Dodger-

But not even contemporary atheists are willing to grasp the implications of this: that talking about "human dignity" makes as much sense as talking about the "dignity" of caulilowers!


This isn't a new argument, and I've heard it a lot, and it keeps getting stupider every time I hear it.

There's no "meaning", to the universe.
And there's no "meaning", to life, except what we give it.
And the instrumentality that we use to give that meaning to our lives, is our brains, which evolved via group cooperation, and gave us our innate moral sense.
And it's this moral sense with which we define "human dignity".
So, while the universe doesn't give a damn about our human dignity, I couldn't give a shit, because I do care, and that's enough.

If you think a godless universe equals humans mattering as much as cauliflower, well, go ahead and try to treat me like a cauliflower, and see what happens.
Go on.

1740. Fleabytes

Comment #130567 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 10:11 pm

Hmm, if "on bullshit", could be fluffed up from an article to a book with spacing, typefaces, etc, surely Paula's article could be....

1741. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130440 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 2:16 pm

al-rawandi-

LOL. Indeed.

Only douche nozzles would want to chant "holy, holy, holy, holy.....", to a celestial dictator for eons.

1742. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130432 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 1:59 pm

Y'know something I've noticed?

The ones who are the nicest christians, and the ones who portray christianity in the nicest light...are the ones who don't know much about it.

The ones who've read their bibles cover to cover, and have all these "sophisticated theological arguments", are the ones who spew forth the ugliest, nastiest, most deceitful and illogical reasons for having belief.

And that second group more or less accounts for 97% of the christians I've encountered online.

It's supposed to be this nice, peaceful, lovely way to live, and all I get out of these people is distortion, unreason, smugness, arrogance, passive-aggression, etc, etc.

Yeah, really good advertisement for the faith that lot is.
Ooo, sign me up for some of that shit.

Can I be a finger waving, guilt ridden, masochistic, humanity hating, superstitious, smug, and preening zombie asshole too?
Oh, please say I can!

1743. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130409 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 1:10 pm

al-rawandi-

So my guess is you are going to get a nasty post from Diacanu, and it will probably be well deserved.


Nah, I said my piece, "slimy immoral fucking little weasel piece of shit", pretty much covers it.

I feel for his mom, but Bish is a piggy, and can go wallow in his Jesus with the rest of the psychopaths.

1744. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130387 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 12:57 pm

Where are you, Bishop??

Ha?

Things got too fucking real when I brought up the real suffering of real people, instead of your fruity ass little fairy tales??

You wouldn't have the fucking balls to tell me I've never dealt with difficult issues to my face, you slimy immoral fucking little weasel piece of shit!!

Josh, ban this motherfucker.

1745. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130377 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 12:48 pm

The Bishop-

and don't like to grapple with the difficult issues of life.


Such as?!?!?

Difficult issues like getting hospice care for my grandmother who was dying of fucking cancer?

Or difficult issues like how many motherfucking angels can dance on the head of a motherfucking pin??

1746. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130368 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 12:41 pm

No, Bish, atheism goes like this.

You claim there is a God, let's see some evidence.
No? You don't have any?
Well, I won't believe in this God person until you cough some up.
Good day.

1747. Fleabytes

Comment #130358 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 12:10 pm

At the bottom of the article, but before the comments, there's a thingy.
Set it to "excellent".

1748. Fleabytes

Comment #130354 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 12:01 pm

Everyone, rank this article excellent, it's gotta be on the top 20 list!!

1749. Why Darwin matters

Comment #130352 by Diacanu on February 20, 2008 at 12:00 pm

hungarianelephant-


Perhaps you are a different kind of bishop? Chess, perhaps, since you only seem to be able to move diagonally.


And he looks like a robot pecker.

1750. Fleabytes

Comment #130030 by Diacanu on February 19, 2008 at 11:49 pm

Paula!!

First!! *hug* *cheek smooch*

Haha, suckas!!