351. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218764 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 5:00 pm
Can you guys please stop speaking spanish?
352. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218745 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 4:38 pm
OK. How is this.
You made inappropriate comments. Al called you on it. You were embarrased. You started crying about how mean everyone is on this site. Some atheists are mean, DR is nice, therefore god exists. And because he loved me first.
My point was that your comments come across as arrogant. So again, why are you so sure god exists now???
353. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup
Comment #218738 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 4:29 pm
RM wrote:
""Richard Morgan as a sexual abuser" is almost an urban legend dreamed up by al-rawandi's fertile imagination."
Really? Then why did you delete your offensive comments?
354. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup
Comment #218689 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 3:38 pm
1364. Comment #218687 by Sciros on July 25, 2008 at 3:36 pm
UH OH!
355. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218674 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Al,
There we go. No beard.
356. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218577 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Carto Kkelly,
What about Thai guys?
357. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup
Comment #218563 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 2:19 pm
TWP,
Its time to reach in you purse and pull out the emergency vodka.
358. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218561 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Oystein,
I prefer the ursine avatar.
359. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218556 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 2:13 pm
"This "clear-thinking oasis" is beginning to dry up."
That happens every Friday.
360. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218549 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 2:07 pm
Al,
No myspace, sorry.
361. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218536 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Al,
My mom is single if you are interested.
362. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218526 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Al,
Wait a minute. So you were serious about Fran Dresher???
363. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218474 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 1:12 pm
TWP
I dont know? She says she would but she probably would'nt. I could'nt keep a mustache for more than a week. I would look horrible but it would be funny.
364. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218466 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 1:09 pm
twp,
Ha! I havent recieved it yet but I will accept. Although my myspace is pretty lame.
I have to agree with Jessica Biels body.
365. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218457 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Oh I am single thank god. We just "hang out".
I am allergic to relationships.
366. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218452 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Al,
Not really a beard. Just the chin. I think the shadow in that pick makes it look like a beard.
I really want to grow a mustache but I think the girl i am seeing would stop hanging out with me.
367. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218445 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 12:55 pm
twp wrote,
[edit] Keira Knightly is more gorgeous than alba or jolie.
Agreed, she is way hotter.
368. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218444 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 12:54 pm
RM, seriously, no one cares about your stupid myspace.
Here is my myspace page. In case anyone want to see it.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=91658918
369. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218440 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Al,
RM has that sense of arrogance, like he just for sure knows that there is a god now and we just dont understand. The same arrogance he used against theists for months when they came to this site.
RM Why are you so sure there is a god now. Is it just because you were sexually inappropriate towards women at this site and got called on it? Is it because you think atheists are just mean people? Is it because you want attention?
No need to answer. Its because you want attention. Go away.
370. Red hot enlightenment led me to believe in one fewer god
Comment #218400 by righton on July 25, 2008 at 11:44 am
dragon,
can you give an example of brokeness used in a sentence?
371. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York
Comment #217777 by righton on July 24, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Al,
Please don't change your style. My work week would be much less entertaining.
372. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup
Comment #216745 by righton on July 23, 2008 at 1:21 pm
I dont think anyone reads Tera comments. Its like wiping with sand paper.
373. Islam subway ads cause stir in New York
Comment #216743 by righton on July 23, 2008 at 1:17 pm
138
ursine? Ha!
That was good!
374. Richard Dawkins slaps creationists into the primordial soup
Comment #216068 by righton on July 22, 2008 at 5:49 pm
"because he loved me first."
Vomit
Comment #212607 by righton on July 17, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Will people think I am immoral for using the term "dickrash"? Oh thanks a lot Elli.
Comment #212605 by righton on July 17, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Elli,
Thanks for "dickrash" I am going to use that one a lot.
Comment #212587 by righton on July 17, 2008 at 11:46 am
Good comment MARKW
If RM does not think this is a "clear-thinking oasis" why doesnt he attack the actual content of the comments that he thinks are not "clear-thinking".
Damn, I hate wasting my time on this child.
Comment #212538 by righton on July 17, 2008 at 10:06 am
OH boy, look who needs some more attention.
RM, are they done babysitting you over at the church?
379. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #210442 by righton on July 14, 2008 at 2:41 pm
8970. Comment #210275 by Scot Rafkin
I am going to have to second the standing ovation, that was nice.
*standing ovation*
380. PLEASE WRITE IN SUPPORT OF PZ MYERS
Comment #208092 by righton on July 10, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Do you really think the president of a university is going to fire PZ because some catholics are sending him letters?
Comment #200386 by righton on June 27, 2008 at 12:53 pm
HA!
Eat shit and die.
382. Spanish parliament to extend rights to apes
Comment #199953 by righton on June 26, 2008 at 2:32 pm
I think education plays a big role in intelligence. Almost everyone could be considered intelligent if they are brought up in the right environment.
If parents do not value education their children most likely will not be educated. If the children grow up and decide they value education then it is up to them to educate themselves even though they are already behind the other "intelligent" people.
383. The Flea Delusion
Comment #198991 by righton on June 25, 2008 at 1:33 am
"We can love Him, because He first loved us."
Welp, Im sold. Sign me up!
384. Losing Our Spines to Save Our Necks
Comment #192020 by righton on June 12, 2008 at 10:24 am
Lastgreekstanding,
Did you get picked on when you were younger? Are you short and have a short man complex? Do you have a small penis?
What exactly are you trying to prove here?
385. Fleabytes
Comment #191185 by righton on June 10, 2008 at 10:39 am
RM wrote
"And for those, who, behind intellectual brilliance hide a profound emotional anguish, especially....."
Just because you are emotionally weak (understatement) does not mean others are.
386. Losing Our Spines to Save Our Necks
Comment #190930 by righton on June 10, 2008 at 12:04 am
greek said:
_riverrun_ is not particapating in the discussion, but I am. So leave him/her out of it. [I must say, he/she must have verbally taken you to the cleaners---bigtime---because you're still smarting from the exchange. Ouch!]
Then said:
"If you're going to dish it out ("Chomsky catamite", "soppy cunt"), that's cool. But be prepared to take it on the chin. Capiche! Don't whine like a baby."
Hey greek/riverrun,
al called riverrun a "chomsky catamite", not you. So how did you know about that unless you are riverrun. Its ok bud, we already knew anyway.
riverrun wrote
"For all you know, righton may be collaborating with me?"
"Collaborating"?
God you are a loser.
I have known al for quite a while, but nice try.
387. Holiday in Hellmouth
Comment #190373 by righton on June 9, 2008 at 1:54 am
"weesam and righton...have a look at a dictionary under the word 'irony."
ummmmm, I don't get it.
388. Holiday in Hellmouth
Comment #190352 by righton on June 8, 2008 at 11:54 pm
clearthinker wrote
"That I did not expect but then God works in mysterious ways."
YESSSSS!!!
my all time favorite quote. God works in mysterious ways.
This always makes me laugh.
389. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #190256 by righton on June 8, 2008 at 4:20 pm
@ the Zara
Good to have you back. This thread has needed you for a while.
390. Lying for Jesus?
Comment #189246 by righton on June 5, 2008 at 10:32 pm
maxD,
As I said earlier, txpiper is just playing word games. He changes definitions to fit his arguments.
Comment #189244 by righton on June 5, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Actaully, I did my masters in a micro lab, mostly Bacillus. I currently work in a human genetics lab.
I am not sure what bacteria this originated in although I am sure this happened a very, very long time ago. I am pretty sure they originated as viruses.
BTW, my earlier comments in response to moradacious were just trying to say that controls and verification are done before the papers are published. This is just how science works.
Comment #188892 by righton on June 4, 2008 at 11:49 pm
Before a Nobel prize is awarded I think confirmation of exactly how this happened is in order.
Comment #188891 by righton on June 4, 2008 at 11:45 pm
moradacious1
"No other possible explanations? Contamination by a graduate student? Equipment/agar contamination?Gene already there?"
I would think that some kind of controls/test for contamination were done to make sure that this was not caused by contamination or something else. If this was reported without some kind of confirmation it would be very bad science.
394. Storm erupts over 'virginity' divorce
Comment #188330 by righton on June 3, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Appleby wrote:
"Anyway, yes, I prefer virgin (human) females. I see nothing wrong with that. In my experience, they're "tighter", humbler, more tactful and won't try to compare me with the other men they've slept with. And I enjoy teaching them to make up for their lack of experience. It's not just about them pleasuring me. Does having this preference make me a misogynist? I'd settle for old-fashioned (not in the negative sense) but certainly not religious. It has nothing to do with that in my case."
I havent been paying much attention to this thread but I had to comment on this.
Appleby. You are a sick, insecure, little man.
BTW, being a virgin has nothing to do with being "tighter", ask any doctor about this.
Also, I can't believe you said the above quote. Ur sick dude.
Comment #188277 by righton on June 3, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Henri Bergson,
Thanks for the PM. Oh, and thanks for calling me an ignoramous. I think you may have misunderstood my comment. I am interested in your response to this question.
Can you explain why this is proof of "Creative Evolution" theory?
Are you saying that this proves the vital impulse?
397. Storm erupts over 'virginity' divorce
Comment #188267 by righton on June 3, 2008 at 2:44 pm
yeah probaly a good idea. He may track you down and show up at your house if you keep it up.
398. Storm erupts over 'virginity' divorce
Comment #188257 by righton on June 3, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Hey al, did you read the latest by lastgreek standing?
Comment #188235 by righton on June 3, 2008 at 11:56 am
Henri Bergson wrote:
"This sounds worryingly like a possible proof for Henri Bergson's 'Creative Evolution' theory..."
Can you explain why this is proof of "Creative Evolution" theory? Sounds like proof of natural selection to me.
"Mutation seems to involve as yet unknown factors, factors which science will hopefully soon discover."
Again, I dont understand where you got this? In this case it seems that copying errors that lead to the ability to import citrate can easily explain this.
Comment #188208 by righton on June 3, 2008 at 10:52 am
They should sequence the genomes of the starting frozen E. coli and the current citrate eating E. coli then compare. Genome sequencing is getting a lot easier these days.