Comments by born-again-atheist
Go to: Brain That Changes Itself: into the abyss
Go to: Pope confirms sexual abuse apology
Jump to comment 56 by born-again-atheist
Permalink Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:51:00 UTC | #199019
Go to: Richard Dawkins on Doctor Who
Jump to comment 95 by born-again-atheist
Before complaining about acting remember: Richard Dawkins was playing himself, if you're saying his presentation of himself wasn't correct, I suggest you check your little arrogance box, because somehow I don't think you know how he behaves better then you do.
Permalink Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:40:00 UTC | #192024
Go to: Gay brains structured like those of the opposite sex
Jump to comment 76 by born-again-atheist
I still would like to know the cause behind my bisexuality though.. do I have a half-man half-woman brain?
Permalink Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:03:00 UTC | #185414
Go to: Faith no more as World Youth Day fans flames of disbelief
Jump to comment 53 by born-again-atheist
#9
It depends what you mean. I dbout anyone here wants to force people to stop believing. Their desire for "no religion" is not the same as "forced disbelief"
As for morality, nihilism pretty much covers it. Morality is dependant on the individual - most people are inclined to be moral because it's easier, even if they don't realise it.
Permalink Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:05:00 UTC | #180478
Go to: Character Attacks: How to Properly Apply the Ad Hominem
Jump to comment 28 by born-again-atheist
Right, I disagree - Tom Cruise being a scientologist is more then enough reason to boycott a film.
That said, I loosely agree with the rest.
Permalink Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:29:00 UTC | #178376
Go to: Repulsive but right
Jump to comment 31 by born-again-atheist
Permalink Sun, 25 May 2008 21:09:00 UTC | #175244
Go to: Richard Dawkins discusses Einstein's new letters
Jump to comment 28 by born-again-atheist
Permalink Tue, 13 May 2008 23:45:00 UTC | #170733
Go to: Childish superstition: Einstein's letter makes view of religion relatively clear
Jump to comment 14 by born-again-atheist
I think the issue here is Einstein simply didn't like to be labelled by others. He preferred to be called only what he was willing to call himself.
Permalink Mon, 12 May 2008 23:29:00 UTC | #170093
Go to: What are your qualifications to question religion anyway? Just who are you?
Jump to comment 52 by born-again-atheist
I am who I was born to be.
By nature I am inquisitive, questioning, desiring of truth. I seek that which can be answered and explained, and that which answers and explains.
You ask me who am I to question religion? I ask who are you to follow it?
Permalink Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:37:00 UTC | #164803
Go to: Is religion a threat to rationality and science?
Jump to comment 8 by born-again-atheist
"Perhaps he might care to re-read the book of Job"
Perhaps this meat sack might care to shove that book up his....
I can't believe they can even attempt to justify the book of job, never mind that god was TAUNTED in to doing all that stuff.
Permalink Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:23:00 UTC | #157941
Go to: Richard Dawkins' secular army must be stopped. God is behind some of our greatest art
Jump to comment 22 by born-again-atheist
Permalink Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:48:00 UTC | #152352



















Wow... holy... that's epic.
But I didn't think the doc's ideas were too radical.. I thought it was normal to understand that if we could mimic the signals from lost senses the brain could function... maybe I've just been listening to some strange people.
Permalink Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:34:00 UTC | #209468