Evolution IS a Blind Watchmaker

Reposted from:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcAq9bmCeR0



In this video I deconstruct the broken watch straw man argument used by creationist / ID supporters to attack evolution. I had to pack a ton of information into this video so you WILL need to pause it periodically.

The basic premise of the argument is that a bunch of parts will never randomly assemble into the correct arrangement to form a properly functioning complex. Once again, creationists / ID supporters miss the basic concept of evolution entirely. No biologists believes, nor is there any evidence that complex systems form spontaneously in one fell swoop. That would be creation. Systems evolve through many intermediates, one step at a time, slowly building up the complexity.

Here I deconstruct their straw man argument. Basically, I simulate clocks as living organisms. Selective pressure is focused on their ability to accurately tell time. NO goal is imposed on the design (you can tell this because every simulation ends with a differently constructed clock). And it works. Clocks evolve through a series of transitional forms: Pendulum, Proto-clock, 1-handed Clock, 2-handed Clock, 3-handed Clock, and 4-handed Clock. Gradually the complexity is built up.

These labels I have assigned to the transitional forms have nothing to do with the simulation itself. They are names I assigned so that we could analyze what the population was doing. The clocks are just clocks, living in their world, trying to tell time as accurately as possible.

One thing I wanted to address but didn't have time in the video is how rapid the transitional period can be. In some simulations the population goes from pendulums to 3-handed Clocks in a hundred or so generations. And the transitions between the transitional forms are even more rapid, happening in about ten generations. Chances are none or a very limited representation of that transition will be preserved in the fossil record.

One thing I should add. The program does not draw the clocks. It maintains, mates, and simulates them, but the drawing must be done manually from the genome matrix.

The program is written in MatLab.

The hand rotations that begin with 86 are 86,000 not 86.000. When YouTube compressed the video it becam hard to tell a comma from a period.


I think this is one of the creationist videos that the author has in mind:
http://www.kids4truth.com/watchmaker/watch.html

TAGGED: EVOLUTION, TECHNOLOGY


RELATED CONTENT

Physicists Create Working Transistor...

- - ScienceDaily 19 Comments


Physicists Create Working Transistor
Consisting of a Single Atom

Next Generation: Sneaking into a Cell

Megan Scudellari - TheScientist 7 Comments

Next Generation: Sneaking into a Cell

A nanoscale device measures electrical signals inside cells without causing damage

Can you really be addicted to the...

Polly Curtis - The Guardian 26 Comments


Photograph: Peter Dazeley/Getty Images
Can you really be addicted to the internet?

New DNA reader to bring promise

Sharon Begley - Reuters 10 Comments


Ion Torrent CEO and chairman Jonathan Rothberg
holds a semiconductor sequencing chip that will
be used in the new Proton semi-conductor based
genome sequencing machine in Guilford,
Connecticut, January 5, 2012.
Credit: Reuters/Michelle McLoughlin

Nanoscale wires defy quantum predictions

Edwin Cartlidge - nature 21 Comments

Atomic electrical components conduct just like conventional wires, giving a new lease of life to Moore's law.

Orangutans 'could video chat' between...

Dave Lee - BBC News 21 Comments

MORE

MORE BY CHUCK KOPEC, CDK007

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment