Activity

Sherlock Holmes wrote: “The example does not allow you to conclude that every “thing” exists because of a preceding “more complex thing” it doesn’t lead to that nor did I say that.”

Yes you did.  I was sitting right here.  You were so eager to prove that Lausten and I were “wrong” about something that rather than simply point out the slight ambiguity in his statement, you jumped in feet first with your computer analogy.  It’s a good analogy.  In another context it might have been spot on.  But I have every right to infer that you meant it to apply to the origin of the universe, because that was the topic we were talking about.  And if it is the “correct answer” to the origin of the universe, then it must also be the “correct answer” to the origin of your non-material “creative force”, plus any other “creative force” which we might imagine.

Of course if you are really going to sit there and in all innocence claim that you were talking about a completely different topic, then your comment is irrelevant to the point Lausten was originally making.  🙂