<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science | Tomas | Activity</title>
	<link>https://richarddawkins.net/members/balsaworks/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://richarddawkins.net/members/balsaworks/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Tomas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 20:17:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c5feddfd11224c2a50b18f7a8891926</guid>
				<title>Tomas commented on the post, OPEN DISCUSSION JULY 2022, on the site Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science</title>
				<link>https://richarddawkins.net/2022/07/open-discussion-july-2022/#comment-211304</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:26:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for your responses. Quick responses – I know this is difficult stuff. And a loooong one from Zeuglodon Beta &#8211; thanks very much indeed!<br />
Yes, I have read “the Selfish Gene”, and yes, it is a beautif [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">26b25c50ab3d1d7565bd32ba5f34c5c9</guid>
				<title>Tomas commented on the post, OPEN DISCUSSION JULY 2022, on the site Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science</title>
				<link>https://richarddawkins.net/2022/07/open-discussion-july-2022/#comment-211282</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:17:40 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to question parts of the axiomatic Darwinist theory on biologic evolution, without being labelled a religious fanatic?<br />
The theory has persistent flaws that were hard to overlook even by the man [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>