Activity

@citizenschallengev4 I copy the use of “inteligent”, because i see it to be apropriate.

Why you see repeating a typo appropriate?

I reffered to:

I’m putting “intelligence” in quotes in recognition that what we call intelligence is an extremely local phenomena. It’s a useful concept at human scale when comparing, say, humans and donkeys. But human scale is infinitely small in comparison to reality itself.

I don’t know what word would describe a universal phenomena, a property of reality itself, which would result in something as small as bacteria acting in an intelligent manner, or a process like evolution proceeding in a manner which we would label intelligent if we invented it. So I’m calling such a proposed universal property “intelligence” until we find a better word for it.

#

“Mainly biologic” – seriously?

What about the first nine billion years of matter and the Universe?

Or mineral evolution here on Earth, (although biology did join in on that process rather early on)?

“Mainly” because of its original and most common use to explain the evolution of biological species. – Shouldn’t exclude the way how all other things behave acording to the laws of physics.

Seems a bit contrived. I like “evolution is cumulative change over time” – short and to the point.

I wanted to be precisely; I didn’t know that “cumulative change over time” would be sole accauted for evolution.

How’s that? Using evolution to describe the phenomenon of “god” ? Or?

No. If the laws of physics would be caused by “intelligence” then this “intelligence” came closest to the description of what the term a “god” stands for, as far I know.
Doesn’t mean that it would be a god, just the closest to fit a terms definition.