Activity


  • Mark Wheatcroft replied to the topic CO2 alarmism is not logical by kilo54 in the forum Introduce Yourself 5 years, 3 months ago

    Your level of ignorance is astounding, exceeded only by your stupidity.  I refer you to the “Consciousbreathing.com’ website.  To begin with, pure O2 was given to patients, but many died.  Today, ALL breathing O2 in hospitals contains a trace of CO2.

    And for the other peasant, am M.Wheatcroft BSc, RAFVR, Draper, Bart.  (Baronet.  Not really!)…..we Drapers are pals with HM and HRH Prince Charles – we provided the Sovereign with 500 armed men on 2 occasions, and loaned them money often.  Had dinner with Charles and got to meet Diana when she was just married – a very beautiful woman with a huge empathetic aura about her…..I think she fancied me! (sic)

    We own half of The College of William and Mary (second oldest Uni in USA), Queen Mary College London Uni, 40 hotels and office blocks, 12 schools, 200 old folks in homes, look after wounded veterans, and give scholarships to the young.  See YouTube, “Drapers Hall” the richest Livery Hall in England.  Built when my family were Beadles for over 70 years.      As a Draper, I cannot be arrested for ‘drunk and disorderly’, and indeed, the Constables have to take me home for free!

    Look, insulating 500 roofs in UK would cost the same as a windmill.  The insulation would save MORE energy in 2 years than the energy from the 25 year life.  So about 12 TIMES better!

    To change to windmills would mean covering half of the UK with windmills.      But none of you address the issues I have raised – that CO2 is only 0.3% of forcing.  The rest is from the decrease in cloud cover caused by our cleaning the air of aerosols, AND by Synodic Resonance……if you place 3 pendulum clocks on a wall, within 5 minutes, they will all be in sync.   SR makes the Sun hotter with more Sunspots – this in turn shields the Earth more from Cosmic Radiation (I am the author of, “Cosmic Ray induced radio nuclides and their uses in Oceanography.”) which is also an important source of cloud nucleation.

    Be10 is an excellent proxy for Sun strength.  As it is rare (unlike C14), no prob with contamination.  Its radioactivity telling us WHEN deposited, and the AMOUNT telling us how hot the Sun was – more Be10, weaker Sun.  Be is nasty; used in atom bombs – got to see an H bomb when visiting a V bomber station – big fat white thing.

    Water vapour 47 times that of CO2 in the Tropics.  Is 2 times a better greenhouse gas than CO2, so is 94 times MORE important as a forcer than CO2.  Seawater is BUFFERED so resists changes to pH…..water at 0C holds 4 times the CO2 of 27C water, so as temps rise LESS O2 in seawater, not more.

    Timor Leste, where my son works, is 3C warmer than The Great Barrier reef, yet coral THRIVING, and more fish by type than anywhere in the World – 600+.  So is warming hurting TGBR ?          Remember, boys and girls, the issues not mediocre slander!

    So, name 2 bad things PRESENTLY from GW, and name 2 examples of Positive feedback in nature – will send you $100 if you can.  NO instability, castoring say.  Not fire – chemical reaction, so not counted.