Activity

Incidentally it is incorrect to say… — Holmes

This is an example of requiring that when something is stated, you expect a complete thesis of the full context. Without that, you claim ignorance. You have been here long enough to know that CC knows the part that you filled in. He expects you know it, and you showed that you did. So he left out, not out of lack of knowledge, but lack of it being necessary. I will continue to point out crap like this until it stops. That you go on to defend Berlinski for doing exactly the same thing is infuriating.