Activity

2) There are literally dozens of scientific refutations of Casey Luskin’s books, articles and speeches. Again and again and again, they point out that Luskin does not know what he is talking about in terms of science. He is not credible, except in religious circles.  — Tee

1) And how does that prove that his scientific objections to evolution are thereby, inevitably false? – Holmes

That’s it in a nutshell folks. Luskin has been refuted, and Holmes asks, “how does that prove he’s wrong?”.

Holmes wants us to take the links and arguments we’ve provided and synthesize them in to some short but understandable refutation of this one particular guy. It must pass his standards, which he has not provided. Holmes regularly avoids points made and switches from one thread to another quickly. He shows little interest in lines of thought that are introduced, preferring to discuss tone or his right to speculate. Is there any doubt that even if a treatise on Luskin was given, point by point, Holmes would find another essay, longer perhaps, and ask, “but what about this guy?”