Activity

I linked to the site about Theodosius because it contained much of the data I consider relevant to refuting your statements in a concise format. That “same data” has continued to be studied so it’s age is irrelevant. If you have information that it’s changed, then present that, instead of just “wondering” about it. People have been “cracking open the doors” for 100 years now, but you keep talking like it’s you who is somehow ahead of the game. To support yourself, you refer to archaeology that was refuted almost the moment it was presented; a box of bones from who knows where.

Then you lead me back to the site I sent you to, different page, same author. A page that disagrees with you. That’s some kind of weird trolling. http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/James-box.html

Could you please post a list of all the destroyed documents by the Church and I will show you which ones on your list will most likely have the documentation you request.

Is that sarcasm? I prefer using documents that actually exist.