Activity

I expect you to know the basic issues of the topic you are debating about.

Oh, we’re debating now, I didn’t realize that. I thought you were pontificating. I’ve done nothing but correct your characterizations of me (telling you I’m not rejecting the Hard Problem 3 times), and asked for definitions of terms, like “seeing” and “thinking deeply”. It took 4 pages before you referenced Chalmers, and honestly, I’m not sure you’re doing him justice, but I’m not going to spend a lot of time critiquing that. I’ll just note once again that there are other opinions, like, Churchland, Lewis, and Minsky.

This is a discussion forum, not a debate, not a scholarly review, not a panel of experts. If you wanted a debate, and you stated that at the beginning, I likely would have not responded at all.