Activity

That flowed much better for me, each section, starting with the “IF” was neatly demarcated and you built your conclusions on premises. You give a teaser for what you could talk about and enough introduction to show there is lots more there. We’ve argued about those details before, but that’s not what you’re looking for here. So, just a few words and phrases will tidy it up nicely I believe.
At the point where you ask the question about when should we start challenging, then answer it with “not with attacks”, I had to stop and figure out that was your response to your own question. Something preceding that, like “the answer should…” or something would help there.
Near the top you say, “tongue in check”. I know what “tongue in cheek” means but it doesn’t seem to fit there, so not sure what to do with that.
“Encourage then” looks like it should be “encourage them”.
2018 s/b 2019. Cut and paste error?