Activity

If I follow the logic, you can’t talk about the evidence of his guilt because that’s accusing him of guilt before he’s convicted, but you want the investigation to be open. We can’t have investigations because he is not proven guilty yet, but there has to be a vote on his guilt, based on, what?

I might be exaggerating a bit here, but it’s not far from what you’re saying. Explain what process you think there should be. Something more than vague comparisons to dictators.