Activity

It is now @lausten.  Like imparsimonious.  Usage is correct.  What adjective would you derive from polydactyly?

@citizenschallengev4, arm uh no nuthin.  I did the ‘math’ to satisfy myself with regard to Heisenberg 30 years ago and was utterly delighted by it.  But I really am a massive underachiever.  Which is an overstatement.  Typical.  I can’t even do mediocrity.  But.  I’ve learned that nobody else knows nuthin either. Apart from the ‘math’.  And reason as by our hero young Dickie.

So. c, G, h, mu zero, emm ee and the abstruse quark, gauge, Higgs etc (QCD vacuum phase) stuff are only subject to change as they settle down, if anything.

Now that is a bloody good question as to whether c, G, h et al are fixed by minimal quantum noise coming in to contact with the rest of nature – wave function collapse.  Prior to that they may well be irrelevant.  Indeterminate.  What is the minimal scintilla – string or whatever – of existence?  Does it omm in those keys? OR DOES GOD?!?!?

There are no formulae for c, G, h etc, they cannot be derived, only measured.  If you have formulae, you’ll get a Nobel and a Fields for each.  Unless you know them in the Jungian (not King James!) sense.  The link shows no formulae for them as there aren’t any.