Activity

I know that it can be tricky, to not bring political beliefs into a discussion of a scientific (or, in this case, a pretend-scientific) topic.  But in the case of climate change denial, we have political interests overriding the legitimate science that has been done.  And those political interests have been very well funded and have existed for a long time.  They can afford some of the best thinkers to lie in “scientifically seeming” ways.

https://www.beforetheflood.com/explore/the-deniers/top-10-climate-deniers/

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/climate-change-denial-fossil-fuel-think-tank-sceptic-misinformation-1.5297236

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/147382/epa-openly-promoting-climate-denial-think-tank

oh, and Indiana appears to be a Brit, so,

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/10/thinktank-climate-science-institute-economic-affairs

This topic is a political topic.