Activity

If the “Noble?” Mark were not so interested in celebrating his own hubris, he might have responded to the explanation site, that I posted for him that explains why our atmosphere is not remotely saturated with CO2, hence his fossil fuel think tank talking point about CO2 logarithmic BS, is busted.   Let’s try again.

“… if we add more greenhouse gases the air needs to be thinner before heat radiation is able to escape to space. So this can only happen higher in the atmosphere. Where it is colder. So the amount of heat escaping is reduced.

By adding greenhouse gases, we force the radiation to space to come from higher, colder air, reducing the flow of radiation to space. And there is still a lot of scope for more greenhouse gases to push ‘the action’ higher and higher, into colder and colder air, restricting the rate of radiation to space even further.

The Greenhouse Effect isn’t even remotely Saturated. Myth Busted!”

https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php?a=82&p=5