Activity


  • It is a serious misinterpretation and use of the circulus probando logic issue.  I don’t say that science as a concept explains why we have science, or the “laws of nature” explain why we have “laws of nature”.  But I can and do come up with explanation as to how “the laws of nature” came to exist by using concepts discovered by science, including some concepts embodied in the discovered “laws of nature”.

    The religious, otoh, seem quite capable of explaining the existence of God by saying God always existed. Iow, God is, because God always was (explanation done). Circulus probando?