Activity

I noticed the guy mentioned the possibility of some potential support of the idea of free will. But he also said something at the end about the potential development of a computer that does not rely on algorithms.  He definitely seems to be trying to push the boundaries of what is known.  Scientists do that sometimes  (maybe most of the time?).

That is why what our best determination of what is most true, can change with the discovery of new evidence.   Like I have tried to tell you. You make your best interpretation, now, of what is true, and accept that there is some things that you cannot know, yet, maybe never, and go from there.  Then if/when what is known changes, you can reassess, if necessary, how you look at things.

Knowledge is a moth, Carlos.  (I just threw that in.  I don’t know what it means.)