Will

To all other members of this forum, who are interested in the topic.

====================================

Well, may be this forum is not the most suitable place for discussing of the zigzag mechanical principle. If however somebody is still interested in the topic and/or has some questions and/or suggestions, then we (our team) are open to a…[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

====================

Ok, I see. Our team’s collective desire was you to become a member of our team. But you have decided something else. Well, we respect your decision. Anyway if you change your mind, then you are always welcome to join our team.

Regards,

To @mrmhead.

=====================

Hi there,

Where did you disappear, dear colleague? Some progress related to the mechanical systems simulation programs?

Actually we (or the simulation programs) have to express V2 and V3 as a function of V1, Ma and Mb (and simultaneously as a function of the number and of the shape of the zigzags). Something…[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

======================

Hi there,

There are tens (not to say hundreds) of links, that contain mechanical (and any physical) systems simulation programs. Typical workable examples seem to be Simscape Driveline (which can be found in the link https://ch.mathworks.com/videos/simscape-driveline-overview-117981.html ) and FreeDyn (which…[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

======================

Hi there,

Thank you for your reply.

Yes, there are even more than one experimental models of the zigzag concept. But these are limited to only a few experimental situations. And because of this it would as if be much better if a mechanical-processes-simulation computer program is involved in our research.…[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

========================

Hi @mrmhead,

Hi dear colleague,

Welcome to our team! It would be a real pleasure for us to work together with you!

Congratulations for your invention of the really excellent term “X-Factor function”! Sounds very good!

Yes, you grasped perfectly and entirely the essence of the zigzag concept! My respect…[Read more]

Any comments related to our last post?

To @mrmhead.

=========================

Hi there,

Ok, I am reminding again what I have been talking about.:)

<hr />

1) Look again at PART 3 of the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&t=24s  . Focus on the “upper” zigzag case.
2) Ma = 1 kg.
3) Mb = 4 kg.
————————————
4) Va’ = pre-zig-zag velocity of the bl…[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

I am absolutely sure solely and only about the validity of the experiments, described in PART 3 of our first video. And these are as follows. (Let me only remind them again.)

<hr />

1) Please look again at PART 3 of the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&t=24s and at our post of  June 26, 2021 at 3:08 am.…[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

Hi there,

Thank you for your reply.

Well, you give an interesting idea again — to use an application called “Minitab” that did all sorts of statistical analysis. The latter to be used for a statistical analysis of a wide variety of zigzags’ shape and number (as well as for a wide variety of masses of the bodies taking par…[Read more]

To @citizenschallengev3.

=============================

Hi there,

Thank you for your reply.

I am absolutely sure solely and only about the validity of the experiments, described in PART 3 of our first video. The text below is a combination of our posts of June 15, 2021 at 5:01 am and of June 14, 2021 at 8:07 am. As if this combination clarifies…[Read more]

To @citizenschallengev3.

<hr />

Hi there,

1. About your post of June 23, 2021 at 9:04 am. Well, I do not understand very well what exactly do you mean. Would you explain again your concept?
2. About your post of June 23, 2021 at 9:09 am. Yes, I answered mrmhead’s question about the one-tube-one-ball construction. Please look at (a) my post of  Ju…

[Read more]

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

What happens with our zig-zags?:) Any ideas? Any suggestions? Any experimental results?

To citizenallengev3 and to write4u.

<hr />

And what about Einstein’s theory of relativity and quantum mechanics? These two cannot be true simultaneously and this is the basic problem of modern physics. What do you think about this contradiction?

To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

<hr />

Thank you for your last interesting posts. Need some time to consider them carefully. (@mrmhead is an extremely valuable member of this forum, don’t you think so?:) This is obviously a person of good qualification in many fields of physics.:))

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

1. My respect to your non-standard approach again! You detect another interesting aspect of the problem. What will happen if n (n being the number of the zig-zags) tends to infinity? I don’t now again. This aspect of the problem has to considered and evaluated carefully and thoroughly again. Interesting! (In our numerous…

[Read more]

To write4u.

<hr />

Nice comment. Need some time to consider it carefully.

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

1. Firstly, all that I can say about PART 3 of our first video is that the described-there mechanical phenomenon has been proved experimentally many (may be thousands of) times. The “X effect” exists no matter how small/big is the value of the force of friction inside the zig-zag channels. The “X effect” does not depend on…

[Read more]

To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

<hr />

Your posts are really interesting. Thank you for sending them here in this forum. Please give me some time to consider these posts carefully and thoroughly. I will write to you in the nearest future.

Regards,

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

Any progress related to your evaluation of the “X effect”? The latter does not depend on the value of the force of friction Ffr inside the zigzag channels. No matter how small is Ffr the “X effect” still exists. According to our last experiments Ffr = 0.0000001 N. Therefore (a) Ffr, (b) the related generated heat and (c) the…[Read more]