====================================

Well, may be this forum is not the most suitable place for discussing of the zigzag mechanical principle. If however somebody is still interested in the topic and/or has some questions and/or suggestions, then we (our team) are open to a…[Read more]

====================

Ok, I see. Our team’s collective desire was you to become a member of our team. But you have decided something else. Well, we respect your decision. Anyway if you change your mind, then you are always welcome to join our team.

Regards,

=====================

Hi there,

Where did you disappear, dear colleague? Some progress related to the mechanical systems simulation programs?

Actually we (or the simulation programs) have to express V2 and V3 as a function of V1, Ma and Mb (and simultaneously as a function of the number and of the shape of the zigzags). Something…[Read more]

======================

Hi there,

There are tens (not to say hundreds) of links, that contain mechanical (and any physical) systems simulation programs. Typical workable examples seem to be Simscape Driveline (which can be found in the link https://ch.mathworks.com/videos/simscape-driveline-overview-117981.html ) and FreeDyn (which…[Read more]

======================

Hi there,

Thank you for your reply.

Yes, there are even more than one experimental models of the zigzag concept. But these are limited to only a few experimental situations. And because of this it would as if be much better if a mechanical-processes-simulation computer program is involved in our research.…[Read more]

========================

Hi @mrmhead,

Hi dear colleague,

Welcome to our team! It would be a real pleasure for us to work together with you!

Congratulations for your invention of the really excellent term “X-Factor function”! Sounds very good!

Yes, you grasped perfectly and entirely the essence of the zigzag concept! My respect…[Read more]

=========================

Hi there,

Ok, I am reminding again what I have been talking about.:)

<hr />

1) Look again at PART 3 of the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&t=24s  . Focus on the “upper” zigzag case.
2) Ma = 1 kg.
3) Mb = 4 kg.
————————————
4) Va’ = pre-zig-zag velocity of the bl…[Read more]

<hr />

I am absolutely sure solely and only about the validity of the experiments, described in PART 3 of our first video. And these are as follows. (Let me only remind them again.)

<hr />

1) Please look again at PART 3 of the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&t=24s and at our post of  June 26, 2021 at 3:08 am.…[Read more]

<hr />

Hi there,

Thank you for your reply.

Well, you give an interesting idea again — to use an application called “Minitab” that did all sorts of statistical analysis. The latter to be used for a statistical analysis of a wide variety of zigzags’ shape and number (as well as for a wide variety of masses of the bodies taking par…[Read more]

=============================

Hi there,

Thank you for your reply.

I am absolutely sure solely and only about the validity of the experiments, described in PART 3 of our first video. The text below is a combination of our posts of June 15, 2021 at 5:01 am and of June 14, 2021 at 8:07 am. As if this combination clarifies…[Read more]

<hr />

Hi there,

1. About your post of June 23, 2021 at 9:04 am. Well, I do not understand very well what exactly do you mean. Would you explain again your concept?
2. About your post of June 23, 2021 at 9:09 am. Yes, I answered mrmhead’s question about the one-tube-one-ball construction. Please look at (a) my post of  Ju…

[Read more]

<hr />

What happens with our zig-zags?:) Any ideas? Any suggestions? Any experimental results?

<hr />

And what about Einstein’s theory of relativity and quantum mechanics? These two cannot be true simultaneously and this is the basic problem of modern physics. What do you think about this contradiction?

<hr />

Thank you for your last interesting posts. Need some time to consider them carefully. (@mrmhead is an extremely valuable member of this forum, don’t you think so?:) This is obviously a person of good qualification in many fields of physics.:))

<hr />

1. My respect to your non-standard approach again! You detect another interesting aspect of the problem. What will happen if n (n being the number of the zig-zags) tends to infinity? I don’t now again. This aspect of the problem has to considered and evaluated carefully and thoroughly again. Interesting! (In our numerous…

[Read more]

<hr />

Nice comment. Need some time to consider it carefully.

<hr />

1. Firstly, all that I can say about PART 3 of our first video is that the described-there mechanical phenomenon has been proved experimentally many (may be thousands of) times. The “X effect” exists no matter how small/big is the value of the force of friction inside the zig-zag channels. The “X effect” does not depend on…

[Read more]

<hr />

Your posts are really interesting. Thank you for sending them here in this forum. Please give me some time to consider these posts carefully and thoroughly. I will write to you in the nearest future.

Regards,

<hr />

Any progress related to your evaluation of the “X effect”? The latter does not depend on the value of the force of friction Ffr inside the zigzag channels. No matter how small is Ffr the “X effect” still exists. According to our last experiments Ffr = 0.0000001 N. Therefore (a) Ffr, (b) the related generated heat and (c) the…[Read more]

Time. What is time? Is time only a human “invention”? Does time really exist? I have read somewhere that some “primitive” tribes have no term/definition for time. The latter does not exist for them. But are these tribes really “primitive”? Aren’t they simply closer to reality?

<hr />

Let me remind only again (it is written in the explanatory text of the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  ) that the zigzags generate a mechanical effect (let us call this mechanical effect the X effect), (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. (We…[Read more]

<hr />

Hi dear colleague,

First of all my respect again to your high qualification in the field of theoretical and applied mechanics! You are obviously an expert! We (our team) are deeply impressed by your knowledge and expertise!
And here are our explanations according to your requirements. We accept your approach with some slight…[Read more]

<hr />

Hi dear colleague,

Thank you for your post of June 11, 2021 at 2:57 pm. It is reasonable and smart. Please give me some time to consider it carefully. I will write to you in the nearest future.

<hr />

Hi dear colleague,

Thank you for your reply.

Ok, this is already another song!:)  This is already a dialogue!:)

<hr />

I am fulfilling your request immediately.

Ma = 1 kg

Mb = 4  kg

V1 = 1 m/s

———————-

V2 = 0.6 m/s = theoretical value

V2 = 0.5999992 m/s = mean experimental value

<hr />

V3 = 0.1 m/s = theoretical v…[Read more]

<hr />

Hi dear colleague,

Thank you for your reply.

I am answering you immediately.

Ma = 1 kg

Mb = 4  kg

V1 = 1 m/s

———————-

V2 = 0.6 m/s = theoretical value

V2 = 0.5999992 m/s = mean experimental value

<hr />

V3 = 0.1 m/s = theoretical value

V3 = 0.0999997 m/s = mean experimental value

<hr />

Friction is…[Read more]

=======================================

1. 11 times in a row I have been asking one and same simple questions and 11 times in a row the “top-experts” here in this forum have been avoiding to answer. Why? Because whatever values to choose for V2 and for V3 the result will be always one and same. And this result will be a violation of…

[Read more]

Mb = 4  kg

V1 = 1 m/s

V2 = ? (What would be the value of V2? How many meters per second would V2 be equal to?)

V3 = ? (What would be the value of V3? How many meters per second would V3 be equal to?)

Looking forward to your two answers for the 11th time.

Mb = 4  kg

V1 = 1 m/s

V2 = ? (What would be the value of V2? How many meters per second would V2 be equal to?)

V3 = ? (What would be the value of V3? How many meters per second would V3 be equal to?)

Looking forward to your two answers for the 10th time.

Mb = 4  kg

V1 = 1 m/s

V2 = ? (What would be the value of V2? How many meters per second would V2 be equal to?)

V3 = ? (What would be the value of V3? How many meters per second would V3 be equal to?)

Looking forward to your two answers for the 9th time.

Ma = 1 kg

Mb = 4  kg

V1 = 0.1 m/s

V2 = ? (What would be the value of V2? How many meters per second would V2 equal to?)

V3 = ? (What would be the value of V3? How many meters per second would V3 equal to?)

Looking forward to your two answers…[Read more]

<hr />

We are talking about solid body mechanics. We are not talking about fluid mechanics. Solid body mechanics and fluid mechanics are practically two different fields of knowledge.

Please consider carefully and thoroughly again the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&t=64s

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple…[Read more]

<hr />

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 6th time.

<hr />

Your last post text has absolutely nothing to do with our zigzag concept. You are trying again to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner. Your masters will not pay you your month’s salary because you fail to manipulate successfully the audience. Your masters may even beat you! You (as well as t…[Read more]

Looking forward to your two answers for the 5th time.

<hr />

We do not have for an object to conflict with anybody. On the contrary, we are simply trying to search honestly for the truth.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 4th time.

<hr />

You obviously failed to manipulate the audience. Your masters will beat for sure! You really have to run quickly!:)

<hr />

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 3rd time.

<hr />

Your masters will not pay you your month’s salary because you fail to manipulate successfully the audience. Your masters may even beat you! You have to run quickly!:)

———————————————

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two an…[Read more]

<hr />

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 1st time.

<hr />

It is more than evident for any honest member of good will in this forum that you both are simply in the pay of the official science mafia. You constantly keep trying to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner (1) by imitating a pathological lack of understanding and/or (2) by…[Read more]

<hr />

About the scientific method. No objections. Perfectly agree with you.

About what this experiment is supposed to prove. Here is the explanation. This experiment proves and illustrates a severe violation of the law of conservation of mechanical energy, which directly follows from the theoretically and…[Read more]

[Read more]

<hr />

I am absolutely sure already that you are a payed agent of the official science mafia. How much do they pay you? Shame on you! You are an unworthy person! You try to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and primitive manner by regularly and systematically distorting my words as well as the explanatory texts in our video.

…

[Read more]

———————————————–

You need to see your doctor! You want to convince all of us here in this forum that Pascal is the SI unit for measuring of energy?! You are the next Nobel prize winner! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_(unit))

What Pascal units are you talking about, you ignoramus? We are talking about kinetic energy! And the SI units for kinetic energy are called Joules! I will not discuss this topic with you anymore! Take some beginner’s course in physics and read it carefully and thoroughly at 50 times thus educating seriously yourself in the field of…[Read more]

<hr />

1. You are obviously a wiseacre and your understanding is wrong (as always). You want from us (from our team) to waste a lot of time for preparing an additional video, which describes our real experiments. Ok, we are starting preparing this additional second video.You have to be patient — the preparing of…

[Read more]

<hr />

It seems to me that you do not understand what are you talking about. Or may be you deliberately imitate ignorance and lack of understanding thus trying to manipulate the audience in a clumsy manner? Let us check this.

Firstly, what is this  5 lb. p/sq. inch > 2lb. p/sq. inch? Translate this inequality in SI units. Looking…[Read more]