Write4U

Sidenote:

@write4u What few people understand is that the brain can only make a “best guess” of the incoming sensory data. Therefore increased knowledge aids in cognition of how things work, but also how things do not work, and the choices (best guesses) of remedial action.

The brilliant irony that also the basis of scientific method resembles thi…[Read more]

 @write4u.  I have also tried to construct an analogical equation of God as the spiritual identification for a quasi intelligent mathematically functioning universe.

But it can’t be done.  As soon as you try to makes sense of the concept of a God in a non-scientific context, you run into trouble.

I’m not so sure about that anymore.

I think the…

[Read more]

@write4u It’s a fascinating talk, trust me.

Indeed, this video is a great summary to the basic mechanics of perception.

My question from above is about the point this mechanism does work in a way it isn’t fully reliable anymore. Not only restrictet to sensory perception and its immediate “first level” processing but also the later overall c…[Read more]

@dad1

When people say things like ‘it is fiction’ or ‘it is fantasy’ they cannot support it.

I did support it, but you didn’t like the answer. It seems to me you have an agenda here on the forum.

As for the untold millions killed by godless unbelievers, of course they do not kill because God told them to

Let me fix that for you: As for the…[Read more]

@dad1

Even God has a plethora of names!

Oh yes, even Krishna was the “I am” and was an incarnation of god.

@write4u

I’m sorry if I sound harsh, but don’t come preaching to me when you have no clue as to what you’re talking about. You are not seeking truth, you are seeking justification for centuries of prejudice and self-…

[Read more]

@write4u

I had no doubts, but to some it might have sounded as if humans could mate with other hominids. I just wanted to remove all possible misunderstanding.

Witness the common mistake of “The Scopes Monkey Trial”, which of course misses the point altogether.

Fair enough. This is a group of mostly educated people, so I just assumed eve…[Read more]

@write4u

They would not have offspring. In spite of being 98% related, Humans have 23 pr chromosomes (46) and all other hominids 24 pr (48).

The chromosomes would not match up to produce viable offspring, or the offspring would be sterile.

That’s what I said (not in exact words, but nonetheless, I said it can’t happen) and that’s what they…[Read more]

@write4u Marijuana isn’t for everyone. Some people are allergic to the weed (I and my older son are two) and/or don’t like it (because it triggers breathing issues with us, even if someone else is smoking it, we don’t like it). It really isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. It might help some, but others are allergic to the weed and could be worse…[Read more]

A very appropriate comment. Bartlett cites bacterial growth as an example of the exponential function.

@write4u I remembered from biology class 😄

To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

<hr />

Thank you for your last interesting posts. Need some time to consider them carefully. (@mrmhead is an extremely valuable member of this forum, don’t you think so?:) This is obviously a person of good qualification in many fields of physics.:))

@write4u

Thank you!  I did try the Back thing, but that didn’t work.

However, it was in my Profile!

Thank You!!

To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

<hr />

Your posts are really interesting. Thank you for sending them here in this forum. Please give me some time to consider these posts carefully and thoroughly. I will write to you in the nearest future.

Regards,

@write4u

I’d be stupid to invent a bioweapon without possessing an antidote. I don’t see anyone in particular being immune from the virus or its variants.

Quite true, but you have to admit, COVID-19 would make a good virus for germ warfare. This is something officials have been concerned about with Smallpox and anthrax- that some country wou…[Read more]

To the clumsy manipulators @citizenschallengev3 and @write4u.

<hr />

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 6th time.

To @citizenschallengev3.

<hr />

Your last post text has absolutely nothing to do with our zigzag concept. You are trying again to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner. Your masters will not pay you your month’s salary because you fail to manipulate successfully the audience. Your masters may even beat you! You (as well as t…[Read more]

To @write4u.

<hr />

You obviously failed to manipulate the audience. Your masters will beat for sure! You really have to run quickly!:)

<hr />

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 3rd time.

To @write4u and to @citizenschallengev3.

<hr />

Your masters will not pay you your month’s salary because you fail to manipulate successfully the audience. Your masters may even beat you! You have to run quickly!:)

———————————————

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two an…[Read more]

To @write4u and to @citizenschallengev3.

<hr />

V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

Looking forward to your two answers for the 1st time.

@will34ab
To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

It is more than evident for any honest member of good will in this forum that you both are simply in the pay of the official science mafia. You constantly keep trying to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner (1) by imitating a pathological lack of understanding and/or (2) by…

[Read more]

To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

<hr />

It is more than evident for any honest member of good will in this forum that you both are simply in the pay of the official science mafia. You constantly keep trying to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner (1) by imitating a pathological lack of understanding and/or (2) by…[Read more]